Guest post: 'Doubling paternity leave won't work - unless we change society's perception of stay-at-home dads'
On Sunday, the IPPR recommended that statutory paternity leave should be twice as long and paid at almost twice the present rate, to encourage more men to take it up when their children are born. Here, MN blogger Man Vs. Pink argues that, whilst the changes would be welcome, more needs to be done to tackle out-dated stereotypes about which parent should be the primary carer.
Man vs. Pink
Posted on: Tue 17-Jun-14 15:59:44
(34 comments )
From my own experience, I believe that fathers being able to spend more time with their partner and child following birth can only be positive thing.
I was lucky enough to have the first five weeks of my daughter's life at home. We all know that when a new baby arrives, it's all hands on deck and the parenting unit whirs into action. I remember filling every waking moment with the multitude of new (and already existing) tasks we needed to get done, from feeding, sterilising, and dealing with the after effects of leaky nappies, to the usual cooking, cleaning and grocery shopping – anything I could do to take pressure off my wife.
Although my eventual return to the workplace was still challenging, it did feel like we'd had enough time to get into the groove of our new roles, and for my wife to recover somewhat from the strain of giving birth. But I also found it to be an irreplaceable time of bonding with our daughter – and this has continued since we swapped home and work roles, and I became an at-home parent.
I feel sorry for fathers who don't experience more than two weeks at home with their new family – and I believe many men feel short-changed by how minimal an amount of time it is. There's plenty written about how difficult mothers find it when their partners return to work, but little about the emotional stress it puts on fathers, who have to leave their new family unit all too soon for life back at work. I know I would have found it difficult given the unexpected depth of emotion that came with becoming a parent.
Men need to lean in too – for their rights as working parents. They need to demand equal parental leave, pay, and flexibility with the same confidence and tenacity that they put to use when negotiating salaries and career advancement.
An increase in statutory pay would allow parents to feel more comfortable about an inevitable drop in income over the first month – an important factor when there's an additional mouth to feed. It would also help to reinforce paternity leave as an expectation rather than an exception, and the idea of a father as an at-home parent as the norm.
The current parental leave gender imbalance doesn't just potentially create distance between father and child in the early months – it also disproportionately affects the career prospects of all women. A bias against employing women in their thirties because of a fear that they will take maternity leave would be greatly reduced – or even disappear entirely – if there was an expectation that men would share this leave with their partners.
When mothers return to the workplace, it's still widely assumed that only they require flexible working conditions – not fathers. This serves to reinforce the outdated perception that parenting is ‘women's work’. Not only does it give women the anxiety of being perceived as a ‘hassle’ by their employer if they want to work flexibly, but it also discourages fathers from asking for the same allowances.
Sheryl Sandberg talks about the need for women to 'lean in' at work, suggesting that they should be bolder about negotiating pay and promotion. But I think men need to lean in too – for their rights as working parents. They need to demand equal parental leave, pay, and flexibility with the same confidence and tenacity that they put to use when negotiating salaries and career advancement.
I'm sure many employers still see parenthood as a drain on their resources, or a disruption to their productivity – but this means they are excluding talented, qualified, ambitious people from the workplace simply because they're women. And on the flip-side, why are we discouraging at-home parenting as a viable option for fathers, who may thrive in this role?
I believe anything that encourages fathers to be more involved parents will yield a great many benefits: to themselves, to mothers, to employers, and, of course, to their children. But whilst the IPPR's recommendations sound wonderful, they would be a small step. What we need is a progressive attitude from employers - we need to understand that, in the modern world, being a parent is both mum’s and dad’s role.
By Simon Ragoonanan
What frustrates me about this is that yes it would be lovely for DH to be able to spend more time off with baby but the shared leave thing just doesn't work for me - I wasn't ready to go back to work, even by 9 months, physically or emotionally. By 12 months I was. This wouldn't have been any different if I had known that DH was at home with baby, I was breastfeeding still and enjoyed my time off with baby. We are hoping to do exactly the same with baby number 2, even though finances will be really really tight. The debate about maternity/paternity leave needs to look at what families actually need, rather than theoretical ideals, although a one size fits all is always not going to work for some.
The majority of fathers won't take advantage of paternty leave or flexible working if they have someone else in the family willing to take the hit on their career. They aren't mugs.
Isn't it 1% of fathers who have taken up the new paternity leave, or did I misread that statistic in passing?
I really don't care for the patronising tone of you feeling sorry For dads whose pat leave doesn't exceed two weeks.you've essentially taken the same stick used to beat working mums.and you've applied it to dads.no one needs your sympathy,its misplaced and pompous. Whether or not a man takes 2week or prolonged time doesn't render him better dad. I used my energies,negotiation skills to make sure my ft return to work was smooth.neither myself or dp want to be at home ft with the kids.
Being a parent is both parents role,yes.and can be undertaken by two ft workers
Your post is v biddulph oliver james.whiny middle class malaise
My Oh took one day off with each of our children- the actual day of the birth. Any more and he would have been sacked.
His employer doesn't "do" parternity leave.
Just because you feel like that crazycatwoman doesnt mean eveyone does. I have done two 2 week maternitys twice and bfed but dh took over the childcare. I really welcome the new rules coming in for dads in april and will be helpful for us in a couple of years when we try for our 4th
I think making statutory paternity leave on full pay would be a good start (the 2 weeks). DP's work paid this and it really makes taking it a no-brainer. Attitudes as to whether it is taken or not do seem to vary between industries / companies.
It would have to be more money. My DH took 'paternity leave' with DS which was in fact two weeks of his annual leave, which his boss allowed him to start whenever I went into labour. That way he actually got proper pay for those two weeks. We have planned the same this time.
I think increased paternity leave would be great. DP and I planned to share our 'maternity' leave although in the end he only took a month as DD still breastfed several times in the day until she was a year old. I also suspect there was pressure from his employer not to take any longer.
It would have been great for him to have more time off immediately after the birth. He got his two weeks but I was in hospital for most of that, so it didn't feel like we got much time at home as a family before he had to go back to work.
Now we share childcare and both work four days a week. His employer was surprised when he asked for flexible working whereas mine was surprised that I 'only' wanted to drop one day. However, they have both got used to the idea! The point made earlier in this thread about needing the father to be able to increase his hours again if another baby comes along is a really good one. If and when we have a second child I hope to breastfeed them until they are ready to stop, and that will probably mean me taking the bulk of the time off work again. Therefore we would need DP to be working full time in order to pay the bills. Luckily DP's work told him that they will be happy for him to do this (although they would be in their rights to change their mind).
We were lucky as my dh was paid his full wages for his paternity leave. However surely over a nine month period you can save the difference between statutory paternity pay and full wages.
When we have DC2 I would ideally like to go back to work at 9 months and DH to do the remaining 3 months as additional paternity leave. Financially we'd be fine.
However DH's view - which I reluctantly accept is probably correct - is that this would completely destroy any chances of promotion for him. He works in a very old school, male dominated, long hours culture sector and 3 months' paternity leave would be seen as a clear indication of having no ambition.
I agree it's chicken and egg. Once more men do it, it will become more acceptable and less damaging to careers. But someone has to go first and risk their career in doing so.
Join the discussion
Please login first.