"Well that's because you probably haven't compared the game side by side with the PC equivalent. You'd be surprised if you tried it at the dismally low quality of the graphics on a console when compared to a £1,000 PC."
Big deal, I should bloody hope that a machine that's 5 times the price would have better graphics, but graphics are trivial anyway. Nintendo have always been a bit behind graphics-wise but their games are so much more playable and enjoyable. Some of the shittist games ever made had incredible graphics. And the PS3 hardly has bad graphics given it's 6 years old now.
" Secondly, console games tend to be - how can I put this nicely - somewhat less cerebral. I mean yes, playing Race Through The Checkpoints In An Indestructible Car is lovely for half an hour, but it really is rather limited."
Sounds like someone hasn't actually seen the range of console games available. Again, some of the best puzzle games of all time have come through Nintendo.
"Thirdly, the console controller is less flexible than a mouse, particularly for strategy gaming, an area that is particularly poorly served on the console market. There are several reasons for that, but the most important one is the contempt the console makers have for their customers."
Wow! You've got some beef here clearly! Firstly, not everyone plays strategy games. Secondly, I'd like to see you playing SSX, FIFA or Assassin's Creed with a mouse, that would be effing hilarious! Thirdly, when it's called for (F1 2012, GT5,etc.) I have steering wheel and pedals. Driving games with a mouse and keyboard just don't really give that 'simulation' experience do they?!
"Fourthly, console games are also more expensive than PC games. They sell the console at or below cost and recoup the money on the games. While you're paying upward of £50 per game, the price on the PC is about £10 less for the equivalent game. So yes, the console is cheaper, but (particularly if you buy lots of games) it probably works out about the same in the end."
Complete rubbish. The same games are roughly the same price across platforms. But there's a massive preowned market if you don't want to spend too much. Sure you can buy cheap PC games, but they're not going to be quite the same as the high end big releases are they. Mind you, I do enjoy the odd round of Free Cell.
"Fifthly, a console is just a console, even if it'll let you go on the internet. My PC runs my business as well as plays games. Can you run Quickbooks on a console? Can you run Outlook and synch it to your Win8 phone? There's more flexibility."
So you've missed the point. I have a PC for doing PC things, I just wouldn't dream of playing proper games on it. Just as I wouldn't want to run my expenses through on my Playstation. The console is designed for gaming, the PC just doesn't cut it for me. Not since the days of the Amiga have desktop machines been worth it for games. I simply don't want to have to buy a new graphics card every time a new game comes out, it's ludicrous. This isn't pennies we're talking about, it's hundreds and hundreds of pounds difference. I can buy a lot of full price console games with that money (oh and they never cost £50 if you buy them online by the way, rarely more than £35 if you care to look).