Hi MN Experts, I have seen so many discussions re slowcookers I "splashed" out and got the Aldi one recently. I've just used it to cook 2 ham hocks and while they were tasty and cheap I'm wondering how economical it was because they took 10 hours to cook and the slowcooker was very warm to touch all that time so lots of electricity being used. On the other hand I really see how convenient they would be as a complete meal could be ready when you get home from work. Maybe perhaps my Aldi one was a false economy and more expensive ones are cheaper to run..... :)) Would be interested in your thoughts.
FF
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
For related content, visit our food content hub.
Food/Recipes
Slowcookers = convenience rather than economical
24 replies
furryfriends57 · 31/10/2013 19:52
OP posts:
PeggyCarter ·
31/10/2013 19:59
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.