Hi just after someone else's perspective on this as it has been on my mind for weeks now and not sure how clearly I am seeing things anymore.
I work for a company that works over 2 sites, one an hour from where I live and one over 2 hours away. Usually I work at the closer one but have been temporarily based at the further one for the last year or so getting paid travel expenses and given additional travelling time.
Recently my department had been restructured and I have been told I will be based at further site permanently and extra expenses and travel will stop in a years time. This will mean a large chunk of my p/t salary will go on travel and I won't be able to get back in time to collect my children from after school club etc so basically it is impossible for me to continue with these new arrangements. Ideally I would be based at the closer site and travel to the further one, with expenses as necessary.
I have spoken to my Union and have been advised I have a case for redundancy but I would only consider this as a last resort. I have tried to resolve this with my line manager and his boss but they are digging their heels insisting I need to be at the further site even though a lot of my job just requires a computer and desk. I have not been able to get a compelling reason from them why they feel this one sticking point is so important. Other colleagues doing the same jobs as each other are based over two different sites.
I am the only one in the business who does my job and it is one which doesn't bring profit directly to the business but is more a support role. I believe it is valued by many of my colleagues. In the past I have had to work in different areas as priorities changed but I always expressed a desire to complete various projects that had been pending for ages. There has been a lot of nodding and smiling but no change of direction for me and I believe important tasks have been let slide.
Various things have been said over the weeks that have lead me to believe that my line manager's boss would rather my role did not exist at all and was carried out by others. He has called the tasks I want to do a 'luxury', suggested I might do other roles not at all in my skill set and been obscurely stubborn about the geographical location when he hadn't been with anyone else. Initially my role was totally left out of the new structure and it was only when myself and another colleague went to speak to him was it reinstated. He claims it is because I didn't mention it initially but surely he wouldn't just forget about it, especially as he professes to believe how important it all is.
I have resigned myself to taking redundancy or even moving on if it came to it but p/t jobs in my discipline are hard to come by and I enjoy my job. It just seems very manipulative and devious on his part and although I have no proof I am convinced in my own mind this is what is going on.
I guess I am asking if there is anything I can do with my suspicions without making things worse for me? It has been suggested I go to boss's boss to update him but how much to say? And will it make it look as if I am going behind boss's back?
Sorry for the epic post- hope it made sense!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.
Work
Redundancy situation
8 replies
Hedidwhat · 09/06/2016 19:19
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.