Sandcross primary was in special measures 08/09 when it was Orchards. It changed to Sandcross Primary for the Sept 09 intake. We looked round it for that year (as well as every other school within a 10 mile radius) and it really wasn't anywhere near good enough in my opinion, esp compared with the standard of all the other local schools - no prospectus, no breakfast club or after school care, no ofsted reports (all terrible ones from before mysteriously disappeared), no clubs, no reading schemes, no stated aims etc etc. However, the Sandcross people had just taken over and had a lot of plans to turn it around - as I believe it is pretty much acknowledged they have done at the junior school previously. I also looked round the junior school in case my child went to the infants and it was a lot more impressive. I don't know how much they managed to achieve since last September but they can only have improved it. The staff were very comitted to doing so, but it wasn't ready in time for us. However, the council's stated aim of using this school to ease the lack of primary places in Reigate ('the Reigate Review') seems a bit unlikely in the short term, even if they went up to 3 form entry, as this school is only ever going to appeal to people that live in the very local area as it is quite geographically distinct from more central parts of Reigate and is a feeder for Sandcross Juniors, not the Priory.
As a previous posters have said, the reason there is such a problem in Reigate is that they need more places, the existing schools are full to bursting, and the only place they have any slack left is a school that does not well serve the non-local areas and has a bad reputation to overturn before it becomes more attractive enough for people to drive their kids in from out of the area. Their models are also crap - predicted birth rate as mentioned which doesn't take into account rental properties with kids, infill, new housing developments such as the one in Merstham (which alone is predicted to add another 2 classes of kids into the mix within a couple of years). They know all this (they have consistently been unable to provide places for all the children on the waiting lists for the last 3 years and appeals increase each year) so the situation will only get worse unless they provide a new school imo.
Parish has 30 church places and 30 community places, not 40/20, and nobody who does not qualify for a church place will get in as a church place, so I don't see why anyone would expect it. Anyone who lives within a small radius of the school (north or south of the highstreet, don't understand why this should affect expectation - it is about radial distance around the school) should expect to be able to get one of the community places, tho abviously after siblings there are only 20 odd places every year so you have to be extremely close.
The other thing you have to remember is that it is not about catchment area, the places go to the applicants who are closest to the school using radial straight line distances (irrespective of whether you live north or south of the high street), once all special needs and sibling places have been filled. Siblings account for at least one class a year. This is further complicated by the fact that they have a "child's nearest school" criteris which is higher than the "other" criteria. Hence you get the situation where a child is offered a place that lives further away from the school than you do because they don't live closer to any other school. It is all about 3D geography for non sib/sn kids so you need to check in advance which school you are closest to - this is the one you are more than likely to get.
I personally think you should take all forms of information into account when trying to negotiate the schools minefield in reigate and make your own decisions - "school gate gossip"/other parents experiences/opinions can be just as useful as the ofsted reports, league tables, visits etc as long as you take it all as opinion and form your own after visiting the school. I have to say that pretty much all of the gossip I heard seemed to pretty much match what I saw at the schools, heard from other parents and read in ofsted reports.
My own personal rant about Reigate and schools is a) the people constantly banging on about catchment areas when no such thing exists across the whole of Surrey. So they say in one breath, well you can't expect a place where you live but we can because we're in the catchment area/live North of the high street when such concepts are completey irrelevent. It is about radial straight line distance and which school you are closest to, only, after siblings and special needs. If you live just south of the fabled hight street you could quite easily be closer than a child living well North and vice versa. And b) the inverse snobbery of the anti-yummy-mummies who accuse anyone of wanting their children to go to what they consider to be a good school for them of being middle class snobs, particularly if this happens to coincide with where the "school gate gossip" rates (really, I wonder why? Perhaps it is generally right!), yet wouldn't dream of sending their kids anywhere else.