Mumsnet Moonwatch

Mumsnet Talk

"The country's most popular meeting point for parents" The Times
  Topics | Active | Search  
PhonePayplus A phone is for life, not just for Christmas
With mobile phones on top of many children’s wish lists this Christmas, PhonepayPlus is encouraging parents to be more phone-aware when it comes to the ongoing costs of a mobile phone.For information and tips visit: www.phonepayplus.org.uk/output/A-phone-is-for-life.aspx PhonePayplus

Recipe of the week

penguinmum's creamy fish pie: smoky, seasonal fish in a creamy white sauce with grated, rather than mashed, tatties on top - a meal of the highest comfort-food order.

MN Local

Please login or join Mumsnet first.

Follow mumsnet on...

TwitterFacebookYoutube


Mumsnet Talk


Start new thread within this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread |
Add a message
This is page 1 of 3 (This thread has 21 messages.) First | Previous | Next | Last Go to page

Was I wrong to have spoken to DS1's teacher.... warning - long and rambling!

(21 Posts)
DS1(yr 2) came home from school yesterday very upset. He told me that he had been sitting at a table with 2 girls who were whispering to each other. One of the girls said that DS1 had said "stupid" and that she wanted to tell the teacher but was too frightened. The other girl said that she would go with her to tell the teacher. Both girls went to the teacher and told her that DS1 had said"stupid".

DS1 denied he said this, but the girls insisted that he had. The teacher said that they would have one last chance to tell the truth. My son claims that he was worried that if he didn't tell the teacher that he had said "stupid" (even though he hadn't) that he would get into even more trouble. He therefore lied and told the teacher that he had said "stupid" to himself. As a consequence he lost play time for "lying" (ie denying he had said stupid)and the girls lost a minute for telling tales.

My son was very upset that the girls would make up a story to get him into trouble. I spoke to his teacher to tell her what he had told me and that he had lied when he told her that he had said "stupid" because he was worried that he would get into more trouble. She became very vehement that DS1 knew that he would not get into trouble if he told the truth. Furthermore, she told me that my son had a history of lying.

Although there had been a previous incident with one of the girls whereby she "set up" DS1 and another girl to utter a "forbidden" word, DS1's teacher dismissed this as an example of friction between DS1 and this girl. She then went on to say that DS1 was ALWAYS the instigator and the other girl merely responds. Furthermore, in her view this girl and the other girl would never have got together to purposefully get DS1 into trouble and that DS1 was lying to me as well.

The teacher became quite angry with me and accused me of undermining her authority and of making a big issue out of nothing. I tried to expalin to her that as a parent I feel that I have a duty to support my child when he is upset. I am not a one-eyed parent who thinks her child can do no wrong. I am always on the side of the school when DS1 has been disciplined for something which he has done. DS1 adores this teacher and it is very upsetting that she obviously does not like him! She is very "matey" with his teacher next year, so I am concerned that his new teacher will share the same assumptions (ie he lies and is always the instigator of trouble). It is pointless speaking to the head as she is VERY defensive and always takes the side of her staff.

How do I help my son if the school always assumes he is the problem? Should I limit my involvement to dropping off and picking up?

All advice welcome!

Thanks for reading my rant....

Mussyhillmum drowning in tears
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Sun 05-Jul-09 08:22:48
I used to help out when DS1 was in infants, and by Y2 I had a lovely insight into the differentce between boys and girls!

Some of these lovely, DELIGHTFUL, sweet, cutesie little girls were closet vixens - I witnessed several occasions where by subtle whispering and name calling, a few of the sharp wee girlies manipulated situations and actually worked a situation around where their 'victim' was the one who ended up being the one who got in trouble because they retaliated noisily to the nasty whispering.

They are all in their 20's now and have grown up into lovely young people, but my goodness, their capacity of unpleasantness when they were 6/7 was breathtaking for a parent of boys who were relatively oblivious to the complexities of relationships and worked on a WYSIWYG basis.

Boys unfortunately rarely have such developed logical thinking skills IMHO at infant age, by and large girls are just so much sharper. Sounds like your DS is having to learn this the hard way unfortunately.

You also get to know which teachers either just prefer girls and find boys a PITA, or which just don't like your kid. There is a seriously 'girl favouring' teacher in Y1 at my kids school, she's been married for several years now and is in her early 30's so I'm hoping when DS4 gets to Y1 she might be starting a family (fingers crossed).
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Sun 05-Jul-09 05:29:26
The teacher is correct - you are making a big issue out of nothing.
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Sat 04-Jul-09 23:18:16
Yes because they see them functioning in a group situation,day in day out,fitting in and some days off colour,losing games,etc etc.
school life is a lot more demanding than homelife in that way.
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:55:21
I sometimes think teachers do knwo all sides of kids better tbh
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:43:19
It is very difficult not to get involved, isn't it. My DD keeps coming home with stories about how a particular girl is nasty to her and her friends, but feels that they are the one's getting the blame. Nothing like this has happened in her previous 2 schools so she is certainly not a natural trouble maker. I have been itching to speak to her teacher about what is going on, but think I will get involved in a "she said, well she said this" conversation that may just be unhelpful and upsetting so I am trying to keep out of it. Fortunately this girl is probably moving schools September
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:13:02
mussyhillmum You know your child. NOBODY knows your child better than you. Since you say you are usually on the side of the school when disciplining, the teacher should certainly give you the benefit of the doubt on this ocassion. I also think that missing play as a punishment for something where (since she neither saw nor heard directly, it being a case of one persons word agaisn't anothers) the truth is not 100% certain or possible, was wrong. IMO missing a playtime in a 6 hour day is a punishment carted out too many times in schools.

However, do take a breath and try to put it down to experience. Encourage your DS to see that sometimes teachers can't always see and sort out everything, and teach him to stick by the truth regardless of the consequences.

Also have worked in several schools and yes the names of very disruptive children do get bandied around. However, this I think was a relatively minor incident (not trying to downplay how it affects you or ds) and his new teacher, i'm sure, won't show bias agaisnt him at all. Remember most teachers like children and want to get along with them and their parents since it makes their work easier. The year is nearly over so I'd let sleeping dogs lie and look ahead.
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:09:12
Just read new messages.

No, I don't think teachers "conspire" but they do pass on information from year to year about pupils.

WhereverIlaymyhat - Huge sympathy - DS1 was also bullied in Reception and Yr1 and we met with the same response. Perpetrator would deny it and DS1 would get in trouble for telling tales.

For those of you who suggest I forget it - you're right. I need to suck it up, but really, really hard to hear that someone whom your child adores thinks he is a liar and troublemaker.
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:04:23
i can't believe the teacher didn't say 'ok girls, that's enough. everyone back to work' and carry on with life.

surely the teacher has a lot more important stuff to do than supervise a 'he said, she said' argument between a bunch of 7yos? i think she probably couldn't believe you'd waded in as well tbh - which caught her off guard and made her a bit crosser than she would otherwise have been.

it's hot, it's the end of term, and kids bicker. (particularly yr 2 girls lol)

have a cool drink in the shade and let it go.

(i do understand how upset you are - i have been there - dd1 spent 4 hours crying her eyes out at school and at the childminders after she and a friend got told off for apparently calling another girl 'fat' (not witnessed - a teacher came up out of the blue and ripped into them). she then came home and i ripped into her for being involved. i didn't believe she'd done it, but my viewpoint was to explain that if being involved with x meant y, don't be involved with x, because it will get you into trouble, and everyone will think you are a nasty bully. i wasn't tempted to speak to the teacher at all lol. dd1 ended up at a party with the 'fat' girl and i told her she had better apologise and ask if everything was ok, even if she hadn't done anything. the other girl said, 'oh, it wasn't you anyway, it was x' and they tootled off quite happily.)

they are all mad, and it is all a storm in a teacup. i thank my lucky stars i'm not a teacher with 30 of them to corral.

let it go x
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 14:00:13
Thanks for all your replies!

I do believe the teacher when she says DS1 told her that he had said "stupid". What I wanted to explain to her was that he had only said he had said "stupid" because he was worried that he would get into more trouble if he continued to deny it.

The reason I believed DS1 was because he was soooo upset - lots of tears as to why these two girls wanted to get him into trouble. If he had committed the crime in question, it would have been more typical of him to have come home in a "kick the cat" mood and rant about the "unfairness" of losing play time. Believe me, I am not the mum who moans to the school whenever her child has been disciplined. I am more of the "serves you right for misbehaving" kind of mum.

What I found upsetting was the teacher's assumtion that 1. the girls were incapable of deliberately getting him into trouble 2. DS1 was lying because he had lied in the past (apparently he had pinched someone at the beginning of the year and had denied it) 3. DS1 was always the instigator of difficulties.

I guess I am just shocked by how obvious it is that DS1's teacher does not like him. sad
Add message | Report | Contact poster By Thu 02-Jul-09 13:54:52
Sorry, should have said, no I don't think you were wrong to talk to her but I also don't agree that because she doesn't believe your DS this time that it means 'she obviously does not like him.'
This is page 1 of 3 (This thread has 21 messages.) First | Previous | Next | Last Go to page
Add your message here
Message
Nickname:
Password:
To post a message you need a valid mumsnet nickname and password. If you have forgotten your nickname, click here for a reminder. If you are not yet a member of mumsnet, you can join here.

Emphasis: To bold a word, surround it with asterisks, so *hello* will display hello. For underline use _ , so _hello_ gives hello. For italics use ^, so ^hello^ gives hello. To strike out a word, surround it with two hyphens either side, so --dog-- gives dog

Links and smileys: To insert a smiley face,  , type [smile] or :)
For a big grin,  , type [grin] or :o
For a wink,  , type [wink]
For a shocked face,  , type [shock]
For an angry face,  , type [angry]
For an embarrassed face,  , type [blush]
For a sad face,  , type [sad] or :(
For an envious face,  , type [envy]
For a sceptical face,  , type [hmm]
For a no comment face,  , type [biscuit]

Links The simplest way to insert a link is to enter the link itself, surrounded by [[ and ]]. So if you type [[www.mumsnet.com]], the link will display as http://www.mumsnet.com. If you want your link to display text other than the web address itself, leave a space after the address then add the text before the ]]. So "Look at [[www.mumsnet.com this page]]", would display "Look at this page".
Shortcuts