Schools and their ethnic makeup(47 Posts)
I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this issue.
There are 22,000 children at senior schools in the London Borough of Redbridge.
The ethnic makeup of these children is:
White British 21.6%
Other Asian 8.5%
Other White 6.2%
Other Mixed 2.1%
Mixed White/Caribbean 2.0%
Other Black 1.6%
Mixed White/Asian 1.5%
Mixed White/African 0.7%
Irish Traveller 0
This is not replicated across the borough.
The borough for instance has 3 Catholic schools.
Trinity, Woodford Green (mixed), which is approx 75% white, 4% Asian
Palmer, Seven Kings (Ilford) (mixed), approx 25% white, 30% Asian
Ilford Ursuline High, Ilford (girls), approx 21% white, 36% Asian
There is also a Jewish school, King Solomon which is around 80% white.
The obvious observation is that demographic changes have changed Ilford from an almost entirely white area a few decades ago to an area with a minority white population now, and hence demand for Catholic education has evaporated, and obviously a substantial proportion of the intake is not Catholic.
In leafy Woodford Green however, there is obviously still a substantial white Catholic population.
Performance-wise ALL of the borough's schools perform creditably: www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/education/school_tables/secondary/12/html/eng_maths_317.stm?compare=
The schools ranked by number of white British children are:
King Solomon: 62%
Woodbridge High: 44%
Wanstead High: 35%
Caterham High: 34%
Forest Academy: 27%
Oaks Park High: 21%
The schools in reverse order of pass rate are:
In other words the whitest schools perform worst.
You might assume that being a speaker of English as a second language would be a handicap, but in fact Loxford School, where 45% of children are of Pakistani and Bangladeshi background (both groups have lower than average GCSE pass rates), and fully 78% of children are ESL speakers, children made much better progress than at all of the whitest schools except Trinity. FSM figures for Loxford are also high, with a 6-year FSM eligiblity of 51%, which is by a distance the highest in the borough.
The borough has two 'super-selective' grammar schools. Woodford County High is the girls school, and like Trinity (63% white British) and Woodbridge High (44% white British) is in Woodford (actually Trinity and Woodford County High are both in the relatively posher Woodford Green, whereas Woodbridge is in Woodford).
So you would expect somewhere 40-60% white British, but nope. Just 6%.
In fact the school has 24% Indian, 16% Pakistani, 8% Bangladeshi, and 31% Other Asian, all dwarfing the numbers of White British.
The boys grammar school is a couple of miles down the road in Barkingside has similar stats, 4% white British, 28% Indian, 19% Pakistani, 11% Bangladeshi, 26% Asian.
The girls school has 69% EFL speakers, and the boys 38%.
The absence of white children at the grammar schools is so stark that you have to wonder whether white parents are avoiding it. It seems unlikely that there is a cultural opposition to selection among white British parents, since selective schools in areas with negligible ethnic minority populations are invariably heavily subscribed by white parents.
According to performance statistics, while Indian children are more likely to reach high NC Levels and achieve good GCSE pass rates than white British children, white British children do better than Bangladeshi and Pakistani children, yet even though there are a similar number of white British compared to the total of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children, the latter are 7 times more numerous at the boys' grammar and four times more numerous at the girls' grammar.
I can only assume that white parents do not want to go to a school that is predominantly Asian. But why? And how did it get this way?
This photo from 1975 shows a school that appears to have been 95%+ white:
And why more generally do white British children in Redbridge perform so poorly, worse than non-English speaking children living in poverty?
Maybe the children from these families have a better work ethic and try harder?
What are the "missing" ethnicities from Palmer and Ursuline? Or is there a typo in the numbers?
Why on earth would you "assume that being bilingual was a handicap" ???
I'll get flamed for this but in my opinion it's three things: children from ethnic/disadvantaged backgrounds being prioritised over white children, the strong work ethic that many of these ethnic minority parents instill in their children, and the absolute and appalling lack of discipline that many (not all) English children receive at home. I say this as an English person who grew up with liberal parenting, from what I have seen in the vast vast majority of friends, family and acquaintances. Lots of praise and buying the latest gadgets, but not enough structure, boundaries or effective discipline. I know you mention 'white' children in your OP but I'm specifically talking about English/British kids. My dh is a teacher and has taught in schools with different ethnic makeups, and is the first to say ( particularly around parents evenings) how these kids are severely lacking in respect for their elders and motivation to do their work. That's all really.
That may be true Portofino.
I know that there has been official concern expressed in the past about the performance of Bangladeshi and Pakistani children.
I wonder however having successfully reached/motivated these children and got them to work hard and achieve, why the white British are not following suit.
White British is far more heterogenous than Pakistani of course, as I understand it the majority of British Pakistanis come from a very small area of Pakistan, and mostly share a common religion, culture and so on, whereas 'white British' is actually very diverse in terms of aspirations and cultural background.
Considered across the country as a whole 'white British' does well, but this does cover everything from leafy Hertfordshire to inner city Liverpool, and within this collage there will be huge variations in terms of levels of achievement. I'm not sure however if this means that underperforming white subcultures get neglected, or if they have been targeted but are harder to reach.
I guess over the course of 11 years of education you can teach one group of children to speak English from scratch and then pass 5+ GCSE, providing there's a willingness and environment in which to learn. But if you have a cohort of children who do speak English, but ain't bovvered, so to speak, then after 11 years they will finish school with nothing.
Middle class 'White Flight'?
To answer this you need to know the socio-economic status of the white children in question. It may be that most the middle class white families have up and left those areas, and the ones that are left are largely classed as disadvantaged, from low socio-economic backgrounds are are unlikely to make it to grammar school for that reason. Although some of the Asian and other non-white children may be similarly socio-economically disadvantaged, they often have parents who are far more driven where educational aspiration for their children is concerned.
Sorry not just grammar school, but are performing worse across the board
BackforGood: as I understand it many of these children start school with poor English skills. This seems like a handicap to me.
They will be EFL speakers if both parents are not native speakers, and hence they have grown up speaking a language other than English at home. You can be bilingual but not an EFL speaker.
LadyIsabellaWrotham no typo, I highlighted Asian children because statistically very few of these will be Catholics (however the admissions criteria for the two Ilford schools give priority to those practising another religion above those with n o religion) - most Catholics in the UK are white. There are also around 10% black Caribbean children at these two schools, plus around 20% black African/other (I assume these are Catholics or at Christians). That 30% black likely reflects the Ilford catchment which would be more diverse than Trinity @ Woodford Green, which has only around 10% black.
FellNel, while I have no doubt there has been substantial 'white flight' from Redbridge, it retains appeal for white middle class parents with good Tube connections to the City and some pleasant leafy areas (Wanstead up to Woodford).
Trinity is the obvious white middle class school, around 75% white, 51% High Attainers entering the school, only 4% Low Attainers, plus FSM % are the lowest (excluding the grammar schools) in the borough.
So Trinity is a privileged refuge for the white middle class. And it does get good results. But, Woodford County High, which is just down the road, does even better. Looking at the comparative stats a relatively high (for a grammar school) proportion of Woodford County High girls entered with only Level 4 - 12%. So it's reasonable to assume that many of the children at Trinity could have gone to Woodford County High instead, but their parents preferred a school that essentially selects white middle class children to one that selects Asian middle class children.
It's worth mentioning also that Trinity has a catchment that extends out into leafier parts of Essex - priority is given to Woodford Green, then Chingford, then Clayhall, Loughton, Waltham Abbey, then South Woodford, Hainault, Christ The King, Wanstead. However, with the exception of Waltham Abbey, all of these areas would be within the Redbridge grammar school area, so most girls could choose either school, although Trinity would hold the advantage for siblings, since they could both be sure of going to the same school (of course for girl/boy siblings, the grammar route would send them to Ilford, which is less convenient still).
Do you work for UKIP or something? My dd's school is close to NATO headquarters and the school has a real mix of nationalities/ethnic groups. I don't spend time stressing over it though.
I would be concentrating more on ensuring all schools are fit for purpose. The question should not be "where are all the white children?" More "what do we need to do to ensure that our local education system meets the needs of the incumbent population?"
I love the content and all the stats and percentages, assumptions and stuff.
You could have just said that you think that white people are racist and failure, it would have saved me reading all the guff you dressed it up in.
Portofino: if only white children are performing badly, then they need to be specifically targeted, no?
Where did it say they were performing badly? Like you said it could be racist parents preferring to put their children elsewhere. Or anything really. The stats don't really show anything. How do the percentages in schools reflect the local demographic for example.
To me this looks like racist shite disguised as %. A la Daily Fail.
I am sure that there are EFL issues at primary schools in many boroughs. This is something that needs addressing. However your thread seems to be about attendance and attainment at sought after Secondaries. I know nothing about it really but it seems to me that, a) those EFL kids learn the language, b) they do well at school, c) there are many parents who continue to see race as an issue.
Im a BBC ..I went to an all white comprehensive and I got excellent results. I even got an A for my O`level English. Where some of my friends failed even to get a C. Its not what colour you are or if your are rich or not. Its about knowing as a child if you want to get out of working in a Chip shop. You get educated and hopefully get a good job. That pays well enough so you can live in the posh areas away from the poverty.
A lot of people will flame on this post. It is a reality that non ` British white ` children aspire too. Its more attitude than system failure.
By the way I like UKIP especially Nigel Farage he.brightens up the European Parliament debates.
My sil and bil and their circle of white british friends won't even consider their incredibly high achieving local school because it is largely non white. It is a very odd mind set- if they use state schools they send their children further to a less high achieving school. Or they send them to a so-so local private school. Or they send them on a long commute to a not so local fantastic private school. It's only that last school that has better results than their nearest, automatically rejected state school.
I'm sure I've read research that talks about the children of immigrants tending to be high achieving, regardless of country of origin or ethnicity, though. Something about the sort of people who are prepared to uproot themselves and move across the world to find a better life being the sort of people who are likely to do well, and want the best for their children. So they start off with the advantage of involved, supportive parents.
Seeker i wouldn't call it supportive. It was more punishment for not getting an A. If you do not ace the report card you are not trying hard enough. Hence working in a kitchen till dusk. Scrubbing the gas stoves and the extractor hood. Im sure the south Asians will also have their own type of punishment for not getting A`s.
So yes second generation immigrants will do better. This leaves the third generation who are more in alignment with the white population as most likely the family business had been sold. The money is usually earned from a proffesion.
Thus the third generation has no impetus to acheive as they already live in the posh end of town.
Funny thing is there is no stats for these kids.
I was using "supportive" in its broadest sense!
Kate I think the figures you use don't take into account the relatively large numbers of private schools in the area - off the top of my head I can think of the Forest School, St Aubyns and Bancrofts in Woodford Green alone but I'm fairly sure there are more. I suspect the inclusion of these may produce a clearer picture of what's going on in Redbridge, esp regarding the overall performance of white British kids in the area.
What with the high numbers of private schools AND two super selective grammars, plus the faith schools mentioned, all siphoning off huge chunks of the demographic, I'm not sure how 'comprehensive' the comps in Redbridge actually are.
It's the national picture that pupils of any Asian background outperform white British.
For those on free school meals, Bangladeshi girls are 22.2% ahead of white British girls at GCSE and Bangladeshi boys are 29.3% ahead. For the rest, white British are still outperformed by Irish, Indian and Bangladeshi, and Chinese beat everyone. So that explains why there are fewer white British pupils in grammar schools.
I'd suggest this is to do with aspiration and parenting. Speaking at least one foreign language from birth must lead to higher cognitive development. There may be language barriers initially but the attainment gap for all those whose first language is other than English has closed to 3% and 0.2% for Ebacc (and the remits be big variations between different groups).
I agree that politicians to concentrate on the poorest regions, mostly northern and coastal towns - there is a 30% gap at GCSE between most deprived areas (e.g. places like Clacton, Hull, Knowsley) and least deprived. Academy chains alone don't seem to be making any breakthrough - less likely to collaborate with other schools in the area and external school improvement teams.
'and there must be big variations between different groups' -sorry, predictive text.
Join the discussion
Please login first.