ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
flexi schooling banned?(30 Posts)
Has anyone read this? It is 'Advice on chool Attendance' published by the Dept of Education, and seems to ban flexi schooling (page 22).
Does anyone know the status of this doc? What exactly does 'advice' mean?
I don't think they can get away with that for more than a very short term measure.
From what I've heard they might make parents do flexi in some places so that all the kids can come to school at least some days a week.
Seems odd that those that one to do it are being prevented from doing so.
There are going to be too many pupils for places and the situation will be bad in 2016 see here If LEAs are struggling to find places I think flexi schooling is way,way, down their list of priorities. Had the got thousands of spare school places, with a falling birthrate, I dare say they would be looking to flexi schooling as a way to fill them.
The only way I can see it is working is if Jack just has set days and he takes entire pot luck as to what is happening. Easy enough in reception, but a bit tricky in the juniors when you are on the fifth session of fractions and he has missed session 3 and 4.
And if you read the news there is going to be an enormous shortage of primary school places in the next few years. They only have to be creative about places if the school is in danger of closing-like the one in the link.
It is all to do with funding-these things always are.
Flexi is also very inconvenient-it puts the whole class in a straight jacket for the part timer to be flexible.
It is OK in secondary school with a set timetable but not so in primary.
I can see huge difficulties-e.g. Jack comes in on Wed mornings to do Maths, but on Tues afternoon the class are all engrossed in a history project and you want to carry on first thing on Wed morning and do Maths in the afternoon-by which time Jack has gone. You then have to stick to the timetable and waste all that enthusiasm and disappoint the class or you go with the history and Jack has no idea what is happening-you are 2 weeks in and groups are in the middle of different things-you have to give him a crash course and fit him in a group who all have their parts.
Or Jack comes in for PE because it is your hall spot but the teacher in the year above wants to swap hall spots to practise a play for assembly-there is no problem at all in this.......until you remember Jack.
Schools like flexibility too and not have things set in stone.
I think they wanted to ban flexi, but realised that doing so would require another act to change the Education Act 1996, so they've tried to ban it by making it very difficult to persuade a head to agree to it.
As I said in my very first post- it is all down to money and funding.
The school in the article is a bit different because without flexi schooling they would have had to close. The current news is that there are not going to be enough primary school places so most will be fully subscribed and get funding for full time places easily.
Our son's school terminated our ongoing two year arrangement because of this. Some much for putting the child first. At the same time Children's minister says it's great.
I'll just post this in case anyone is interested!
The part categorically forbidding flexischooling has now been removed from the advice, but the sting is in the tail: flexi-schooled children should be marked absent, instead of given a code B in the daily class registries, (meaning that they are engaged in approved off-site educational activity).
WIth Ofsted on their backs on absence, no head in their right mind is going to approve of flexischooling if that means there absence rates are going up!
So if you have a vested interest in this, I'd say to keep writing to your MP and Ms Truss, and urge them to allow code B. Otherwise the removal of the paragraph banning flexi-schooling is meaningless - the duty to register them as absent is effectively making it impossible for any school to agree to flexi-schooling.
A revised advice doc confirms flexischooling to have been banned. Here's a link to an e-petition to revoke this: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/47147
That's an interesting link, newfashionedmum - thank you! My (LibDem) MP just toes the line in replying to my email, and have written to E. Truss as well. Off to find out if there's any news ..
Feeling very passionate about this!!!
Hi we are looking into this too - our head teacher is openly very supportive of flexi schooling and is taking advice as to how to work around this advice.
interesting commentary here http://libertarianalliance.wordpress.com/2013/03/02/flexischooling/
I tried to flexi school consulted lea put in good proposal with head who said no.Woudent entertain the idea.
I was sad as feel could have been good.
so we ended up ofing schools and never flexi schooling try do extra at home.
(In the meantime, does anyone know what the legal status of this kind of advice document is?)
That's great, Whistle and 5madthings. Will try to spread the word and ask more people to write too..
This is outrageous!
We flexible schooled for a while and it worked brilliantly, particularly for younger children.
I will email!
I'll draft a letter as well. Thanks for the email address.
Whistle - yes, quite... It seems very strange. Why ban something where parents and schools work together for the benefit of children...? Not quite sure what they think this will achieve, but I would very much like to find out..!
The person to write to seems to be Elizabeth Truss MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State. Part of her brief is attendance, so this report will be under her responsibility. firstname.lastname@example.org
I'll be drafting a letter tonight..
Julen, thanks for the link. Had a look and it does seem to very specifically seems to ban flexi-schooling. As if this is going to solve a lot of problems in the system.
Really mummy? I know of five schools in my London LEA alone. I'm not being argumentative, but really it isn't that bizarrely unusual.
Mummytime, I am not taking issue with the Home Ed stance - that is, as you say, clear. I am alos not talking about specialist educational provision, nor am I talking about temporary part-time education, which is allowed only as part of a plan where a child eventaully does return to school full-time.
I am talking about the flexi-schooling arrangement, where for whatever reason parents decide to home-educate their child part-time. This can only be done with the approval of the school's head. As the child is still registered at school, the school still gets funding; part of the educational responsibility is transferred to the parents, although the school eventually still is responsible with regards to academic results etc.
The reason for this choice can be all sorts - medical, social, etc. - and is irrelevant to the argument as such. THe point is that this arrangement is made on a case-by-case basis by parents and head, and is judged by these parties to be beneficial to the child. THat should be enough.
Whistleahapytune, the links is here: http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/a/advice%20on%20school%20attendance%20-%20final%20cleared.pdf
I would really like to find out what the legal status of this 'Advice' is, and to what extent schools are obliged to go with it...
Whistle you were very lucky, I kno wof no schools where the Head would agree to Flexi school except for SEN or medical grounds.
Julen, I'm very interested in this. Do you have a link?
Mummy, there are all kinds of reasons to flexi-school. It doesn't have to mean your DC has SEN or is ill. I have done so in the past (with the heads full consent) when I felt that the school wasn't providing an adequate education, and my daughter needed consolidation on basic maths and literacy, as I wanted to nip this in the bud and not have her struggle through years of primary school . In addition, we did a lot of music and cultural activities to broaden her education. And she learned to swim, very well. I took two afternoons a week to flexi-school one-to-one and it's made a huge difference.
We no longer flexi-school, but I wouldn't hesitate to do it again if I felt it was necessary.
Join the discussion
Please login first.