This topic is for discussing childcare options. If you want to advertise, please use your Local site.
ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
It is illegal to pay a friend to look after DD if she's not registered? Really???(74 Posts)
I was looking on council's website under childcare for more info re childcare in general and it said the following:
"By law, you must be registered with Ofsted (The Office For Standards in Education), if you are being paid or rewarded to look after other people's child(ren) in your own home."
Does that mean I can't ask a friend to look after DD (will be 9 months by then) when I go back to work (would only be for 2 mornings anyway) and pay her? Really???
I would rather leave her with a friend who loves her anyway than with a complete stranger! And she would be the only child under 12 so would get more attention.
Nannies are (or should be) insured. The nannies I know that drive for work have extra insurance as well.
First Aid is interesting. Do you think the OP and her DH have first aid training? I wonder what percentage of new parents do a paediatric fist aid course. I wonder how many people make their parents do a first aid course before they let them look after grandchildren.
Outraged I think all parents of young children, and anyone else who looks after them, should have some sort of first aid training.
The parents first aid argument is a bit of a red herring.
It's about statistics, isn't it? The more children you have/look after, the more likely you will need to administer first aid in an emergency or have to deal with a life-threatening condition or allergy.
I've had to deal with two life-threatening emergencies and I've looked after over 80 children to date.
Quite frankly, of all the training I have had to undertake, I consider that one to be the most vital.
She would be a nanny. And would be employed by you needing tax etc paid.
You would be here employer as you are saying you need her twice a week 7-2pm. Someone who is self employed can say my hours are 9-3 everyday if you want to use my service.
Like a cleaner is self employed as usually have many clients and tell them what hours/ days they are free.
Tax will probably need to be paid as I think it's anything over £107 a week. £3.50 might be your local childminders rates but that's diene to them having several children at that rate ( so 3 under 5s would be £10.50 an hour, plus extra if they have children before and after school). A local nanny rate is prob more like £8 net an hour ( based on area from childminder fees).
£8net is around £9.50 gross. 9.50 x 14= £133 per week, plus an extra 9.50 per hour for any evening work.
( approx figures based on London avergae being £10 net/£13 gross per hour)
Fliss They should be*. My question was, are they?
Xenia - my cleaner isn't my employee, because she is self-employed and runs her own business. Totally different situation to having someone come to your home to look after your child and paying them, as themselves, not through a business. Not like you to miss the detail
People are making a massive mountain out of a molehill over this. If she is an employed she is probably paid less than the level on which tax is payable. If she is self employed she pays tax on what she is paid again IF and only if her annual income is above the tax level which it may well not be.
2 mornings a week is a bit like leaving your children in your home with a babysitter 2 evenings a week. Highly likely she is self employed and up to her to pay tax on that income if she is over the limits.
The simple answer to the question if is she looks after the child are your house then it is absolutely fine.
It does seem a bit silly, doesn't it?
Here in the US you don't have to be registered if you're looking after only one family. Which is also a bit silly, because you could legally look after six children from the same family but not two unrelated kids.
'The simple answer to the question if is she looks after the child are your house then it is absolutely fine.'
You might not agree with the law, but it's still the law.
There's a good chance no-one will know, but it's not 'absolutely fine'.
And it's not 2 mornings a week, it's the best part of 2 days a week, 7 hours a day. It's also not like ad-hoc occasional babysitting, it's a regular agreement.
Aside from it being illegal, it's really bloody annoying for those of us who bust a gut to make a living from childminding legally, who jump through all the hoops with regard to Ofsted, the ICO, insurance, first aid training, Environmental Health registration, tax (and lose tax credits through declaring earnings that take your household over the threshold)
Xenia you're the one making a mountain out of a molehill, everyone else is just answering the OP's questions correctly.
Instead of leading us down the garden path with unsupported statements like "highly likely she is self employed", why don't you look on the HMRC website about what makes someone an employee?
!'The simple answer to the question if is she looks after the child are your house then it is absolutely fine.'
Why is it illegal? I thought everyone agreed that you can pay someone in your own home to look after your child. It is not illegal to do that. Every mumsnetter going out on a Friday night paying a babysitter is not committing an illegal act. Where is the illegality? There is illegality if it is at the home of the friend but not at the child's home.
2 mornings a week. Highloy light the person is self employed nad highly likely unless you are paying her nanny type rates she is paid about 60 a week so well well well under any tax limits even if she were employed.
One reason this country is in such a mess is everyone assumes more regulation exists than it does.
Xenia- why would she not be paying her nanny rates? 14hrs min a week in op house, on days she wants, at times she needs makes her an employeres nanny. And yes as a nanny I pay tax on babysitting
Thearetically a nanny could work 7 nights a week babysitting 6pm-midnight. At £10 that would be £420 cash in hand If they paid no tax. Or earning £21000 a year
'Why is it illegal? I thought everyone agreed that you can pay someone in your own home to look after your child. It is not illegal to do that. Every mumsnetter going out on a Friday night paying a babysitter is not committing an illegal act. Where is the illegality? There is illegality if it is at the home of the friend but not at the child's home'.
You're right Xenia, sorry misread what you said!
I thought it was two mornings a week and yes of course the self employed pay tax on their earnings. The question was can she pay her friend and the answer is yes if the friend looks after the child at home. of course if the friend earns over the single person allowance which is probably very unlikely then the friend must pay tax on the pay and yes sometimes your babysitter is your employee, sometimes your caterer or gardener or cleaner may not be not always by any means and here the hours are so few that it is unlikely whether self employed or employed any tax is likely. I agree with forever that if the hours are fixed then even part time it is possible the person is an employee but certainly we don't know enough here to know if that is so and secondly likely the amount paid is less than tax thresholds anyway.
Just another thought....
I would avoid this at all costs. A friend of mine asked me to be her childminder as I had just resigned from teaching. I went through the whole, long winded, expensive process of registering. Her and her husband took the utter piss, sending their child ill constantly with runny tummies, fevers, you name it!! They refused to collect when they were both off work and turned up whenever they felt like it. They paid me less than the going rate which I stupidly agreed to as they were 'friends'. I felt more and more annoyed and the relationship became strained. Finally, they gave me notice ( not even the full four weeks) to put their awful spoilt child into a nursery, leaving us financially screwed!!
I have had a bad experience and it has put me off childminding for life!! I am happily returning to teaching without another shitty bum in sight!!!
I'm not saying you would take advantage by any means but if you value your friendship, look for a proper childminder!
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
I wonder how many people pay their cleaner and gardener cash?? I would just pay cash and keep quiet nobody would ever know. Nannies do not need to be registered nor do babysitters.
If the child is at its parents' house the rules are the same whether you are an evening babysitter or not. The tests are the same. If the person doing the looking after is self employed they pay their tax - if they are paid enough for tax to be due (a very big iff these days with the single person allowance heading towards £10k a year). If they are employed again and IF the earnings exceed the allowance etc then the employer will have employer NI etc and to run PAYE.
Everyone in the UK has the right to pay anyone cash of course but that is irrelevant to whether tax is due.
Are we really suggesting that someone working 2 mornings a week is likely to be paid enough for that sum to be over the tax thresholds anyway?
I agree Xenia I meant cash in hand. I think it is between them two.
Yes, you're right Mrscupcake, why bother paying tax?! What's a bit of tax evasion between friends?
'Are we really suggesting that someone working 2 mornings a week is likely to be paid enough for that sum to be over the tax thresholds anyway? '
It's 14 hours a week. A nanny in London would probably earn over the threshold in 14 hours, given pay is around £12-13ph. The OP is proposing paying something like £4ph though, so wouldn't be over the threshold.
"I think the hours make the difference - between 8am and 6pm there are different rules"
This is not true.
"If the child is at its parents' house the rules are the same whether you are an evening babysitter or not. The tests are the same. If the person doing the looking after is self employed they pay their tax - if they are paid enough for tax to be due (a very big iff these days with the single person allowance heading towards £10k a year)."
Although the Personal Allowance is indeed heading towards £10k a year, self employed people start paying tax (Class 2 National Insurance) if their earnings are above £5,595 a year, although it is only £2.65pw, and pay Class 4 National Insurance at 9% on earnings above £7,605pa.
"If they are employed again and IF the earnings exceed the allowance etc then the employer will have employer NI etc and to run PAYE."
Again the threshold at which an employer must operate PAYE is much lower than the Personal Allowance at £107pw, but if the employee already has another job then the employer must operate PAYE regardless of earnings.
"Are we really suggesting that someone working 2 mornings a week is likely to be paid enough for that sum to be over the tax thresholds anyway?"
The point is not whether the earnings will be over the tax thresholds, it is that the person is an employee and therefore subject to regulations regarding the National Minimum Wage, minimum annual leave, Employers Liability Insurance etc.
"I wonder how many people pay their cleaner and gardener cash??"
The work of a cleaner or gardner is almost always self employment and so the responsibility for paying any tax due falls on them.
A childcarer working in the home of the child is almost always employed (and the situation described has none of the characteristics that give rise to an exception to this) and therefore the responsibility for paying any tax due falls on the employer.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.