Sort of like this
I am worried it looks too institutional; & is it safe?
Looks bloody awful! Like being in an institution 
belgo
Fri 10-Feb-12 19:18:23
I think they were in my ds's creche? I seem to remember noticing them, although ds was too old to be in a cot so he didn't use them.
south345
Fri 10-Feb-12 19:19:53
I'd be too worried my ds would climb out as he can climb allsorts! Much easier to have a travel cot that you can put away at the end of the day!
belgo
Fri 10-Feb-12 19:20:34
I think they close up completely on the side.
I like those and have looked at the larger bunk cotbed for my twins room. I worked at the babyshow in September and shanticot were nearly opposite the stand I was on. I thought they looked really good and wish I had gone over for a proper look now. They aren't that tall compared to a proper bunk which is what attracted me to consider them for toddlers.
HSMM
Fri 10-Feb-12 19:46:52
I looked at them. I worried about the top child experimenting with climbing out. Also thought the bottom child might kick the divider/ceiling. Good space saver though.
Maryz
Fri 10-Feb-12 19:47:35
I presume you would put the appropriate baby in the appropriate cot, if you ran a day nursery.
So the lower bunk would be for either a small baby (under 6 months) who couldn't pull up, or would be like a bed with a side rail for an older child.
And the upper bunk for a child who was too small to climb out.
They would be very adaptable. And would be great for a "baby room" in a creche, leaving much more available floor space.
tentative123
Fri 10-Feb-12 20:55:59
I love them! Jealous of the kiddies!
Maryz
Fri 10-Feb-12 20:59:20
I also think it's very different to have them in a creche/nursery for naptimes and having them for sleeping all night.
In addition to which, there would be an adult present at all times, so much less of a worry about falling out than if you left your baby in one in their own room all night.
thebody
Fri 10-Feb-12 21:10:57
Think good idea if space a premium and personally don't no any cm in a mansion! So yes look cozy and ok for a nap.
sleeplessinderbyshire
Fri 10-Feb-12 21:34:26
look great and very sensible/practical. They are pretty expensive compared to 2 normal/travel cots though
i really dislike them tbh
i don't like the drop side coming down right next to the lower "bunk"..
on a slight tangent, i realise this isn't the one you're looking at but omg!
mmmm nice toddler bed that's really high with a bloody great gap for them to fall out of!
I think the one the OP linked to would be ok in a chioldminders/nursery setting.
But omg at yesterday's link 
sodding hell, childminders!
Iggly
Fri 10-Feb-12 21:45:05
It reminds me of cages in a vets!
HolyNoSheDittantBatman
Fri 10-Feb-12 22:09:01
I really like them. I think they're very sweet.
I'd be impressed with a childminder who had them because they're so expensive it would indicate the childminder was really committed to doing it properly/long term. I'm a bit put off by the random assortment of old travel cots some childminders have.
QuintessentialyHollow
Fri 10-Feb-12 22:13:27
Would it not be nice to have them in their own individual hammocks hoisted high up under the ceiling? You could even have them in kitchen!
OhBuggerandArse
Fri 10-Feb-12 22:15:36
We have a bunk bed with a cot side attached to the bottom bunk for the little one - much sturdier looking than the one the OP has linked to and works absolutely fine.
Lovely idea Quint -"their own individual hammocks" like cocoons 
No I'd pretty much ruled them out even tho' it would make my life immeasurably easier 
thebody
Fri 10-Feb-12 22:30:53
Ok each to own but thort they safe and practical. Obviously not a bed to sleep in all night but fine for naps.
Incidentally As to the vets comment, I wish my local hospital was as bloody clean as my vets, it's bleached to inch of life.
andthenshewasdone
Fri 10-Feb-12 22:31:00
i think they look really cute and cosy, much nicer than an old travel cot.
I'll just have to have a third extension <sigh>