My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

What do you think of this boys name...

19 replies

BusyBee86 · 17/02/2013 09:07

James Joseph? Joseph being the middle name.

OP posts:
Report
ShowOfHands · 17/02/2013 09:10

It's a normal name. Not weird, not wacky, not remarkable. Just a name. No obvious problems with it, people can spell it you'd hope and everybody will have heard of it. It's not very exciting but no reason why a name should be if that's not what you are looking for.

Report
EnglishGirlApproximately · 17/02/2013 09:12

I like it. I used Joseph for Ds middle name and James was also on the list. I like traditional names :)

Report
BedHog · 17/02/2013 09:16

It's a bit dull to be honest. There are hundreds of thousands of boys names out there, a lot of which are really nice. Have you read through any name books or thought about the names of people you know or have heard of?

Report
raisah · 17/02/2013 09:17

Nice names but any reason why both begin with a J?

Report
FellatioNels0n · 17/02/2013 09:24

It's boring.

Report
12ylnon · 17/02/2013 09:25

I know a James Joseph. It's nice, but a bit normal.

Report
Yama · 17/02/2013 09:26

Lovely.

Report
BusyBee86 · 17/02/2013 10:19

Oh I thought it was a nice traditional name. Sad
I had another thread with the name James Robert...everyone seemed to like this name.
Is James Robert better than James Joseph?

OP posts:
Report
amck5700 · 17/02/2013 11:57

I like it - and JJ is nice too.

Report
sw11mumofone · 17/02/2013 12:15

It IS a nice traditional name. Not everyone has to go for Montys and milos and Xanders. If you like it go for it. And for the record I think James Joseph is much much nicer than James Robert.

Report
Clary · 17/02/2013 16:20

I think it is very nice and will raise no eyebrows.

You should know (if you don't already) that you will meet many many other children with one or both of these names. If we say James in this house (my 3 DC are 13, 11 and 9) there are at least 14 we know well, ditto for Joe/Joseph.

I teach secondary and I have 5 Jameses and 8 Joes in my classes. Just letting you know in case it bothers you (it may not in which case ignore!)

Report
LynetteScavo · 17/02/2013 16:21

James Joseph is much nicer than James Robert.

Report
Littlecherublegs · 17/02/2013 16:32

As long as you dont start calling him JJ then its fine IMHO!

Report
ladymia · 17/02/2013 18:59

It's fine if someone told me they called their son James Joseph i would think oh that's nice and never give it another thought. It's just a plain simple name, no bells or whistles.

Report
Hybrid · 17/02/2013 19:38

It's a nice traditional name and much nicer than James Robert definitely! Like others have said you don't need weirdly wonderful names, just one that you like. If you want traditional then this is a nice combination.

Report
misscomanche · 17/02/2013 19:44

Love it.

Report
louisianablue2000 · 17/02/2013 19:51

Nothing wrong with it. No point going for something just to be different, I think you need a connection with a name to feel right. Personally I prefer James Robert but that's because they are both family names for me. I wouldn't feel the need to pull up my judgy pants about the name James Joseph, unless I was told to call him JJ of course.

Report
blindworm · 17/02/2013 20:06

He won't introduce himself to people as James Joseph anyway. Most people won't even get the alliteration, because to them he'll just be James. I like James Joseph a lot more than James Robert.

Report
mrstowers · 17/02/2013 21:30

James is becoming very popular, so fine if you don't mind that but a bit of a meh name. But have to say that JJ is awful.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.