Genuinely perplexed. More vent than AIBU.(45 Posts)
Maybe not the best thread title in the world. And yes it's a FB thing! And yes I know I can block/delete/hide feed, but this is just symptomatic of a thousand things that are genuinely
irritating quite bizarre in my little world.
Right. I do realise I am not the worlds most empathetic person. I don't invest emotionally in things that do not involve me nor particularly affect me. That doesn't mean I don't understand or acknowledge, I just refuse to go along with mob rule.
I live quite near Woolwich. On Saturday night, I was toying with popping down very early in the morning to pay my respects (by early I do mean at 5am when the area would be desolate) and my friend said "come with me at 10". I knew there was a march planned, so I declined, having absolutely no desire to be caught up with the masses on a rally that may or may not turn nasty. I have strong memories of any rally in the name of Stephen Lawrence being hijacked by the NF and turning into a bloodbath, again all to local for comfort.
So my friend went by herself. And proceeded to plaster pictures of the flowers, teddies, boots, t-shirts, flags and so forth all over face book. A little while later, when she'd had a couple drinks there were posts "raising a glass to Lee Rigby, forever in my heart, I'll never forget you" and the posts were progressively more garbled as the night went on.
Point being, she doesnt know the man, never met the man, doesnt know anyone who ever has, has no interest in politics, the forces. It's like a collective social morbidity. A need to latch onto someone elses grief and make it your own. It's so Diana-esque.
I will visit war graves, but in my little world, it would be thoroughly undignified to take photos like holiday snaps. It's a place for quiet contemplation, giving silent thanks and above all acting in a dignified manner.
I do feel the same about public floral tributes with car crashes. Graveyards are the place for this sort of thing, not heaped on the verge, causing a back log of rubberneckers wondering who was wrapped round that particular lamppost recently.
AIBU to wonder what ever happened to the back bone, stoic outlook and stiff upper lip that Britain was founded on?
It's called "Collective Mourning Sickness" and I think this sums it up: Carol Sarler, writing as a guest columnist for The Times, noted that "this new and peculiar pornography of grief" is sometimes called a 'tribute', "the cruder truth is that ersatz grief is now the new pornography; like the worst of hard-core, it is stimulus by proxy, voyeuristically piggy-backing upon that which might otherwise be deemed personal and private, for no better reason than frisson and the quickening of an otherwise jaded pulse
It's public grief wanking. It started with Diana. It's crass and disgusting.
Yanbu...I'm not a fan of mawkish amulance chasing either.
I'm with you on the 'quietly acknowledging' team.
However, people do sometimes get caught up in the emotion of the moment....and that's ok too....even I personally find it a bit tasteless.
I don't think it's crass or disgusting as the previous poster said, I must say. That's a bit harsh.
I totally agree with everything you said.
However, I have a colleague who's sibling died in a road accident and they place flowers at the scene each year. Now I can kind of understand it for the first anniversary but then surely it would be nicer to celebrate the deceased relative's life by getting the family together somewhere the sibling liked to go.
I don't like it either. It creeps me out to think how invaded families must feel when people do this.
I do think it's crass.
YANBU. I find it incredibly unsettling when outpourings such as you describe are splashed all over the media and fb.
Cross post - I've got to say, I think that's totally different though hoho.
I reckon if you know someone, you grieve however works for you and it's no-one else's business.
But this woman didn't know Rigby at all.
YANBU. I dislike this public outpouring of grief. Unless you personally knew he person, there is no need to post several pictures of there's on and liking all the in memorial pages.
People don't do dignified anymore.
I remember that article. I thought it was so good I cut it out for my media studies class. Yanbu op.
YANBU-the families and relatives being snapped as they go to the scene is particularly invasive, IMO. Is privacy just never considered?
However, I have a colleague who's sibling died in a road accident and they place flowers at the scene each year. Now I can kind of understand it for the first anniversary but then surely it would be nicer to celebrate the deceased relative's life by getting the family together somewhere the sibling liked to go
But that's personal grief. They are not grieving someone in the media who they didn't know.
And who are you to question how people should grieve? Let people do it however they want because it's really none of your business.
I found this horrific murder a lot more upsetting than I normally do about tradegy. I don't know why. I haven't put any comments on Facebook or anything. I don't like the public grief where people make a big deal of raising a glass/we will never forget you type stuff.
I have in private shed a few tears when seeing the newsreports. Seeing the family was particularly upsetting to me. I don't make a big song and dance about it though.
I am the same on remembrance day. I can't believe watch the silence without sheding a tear.
We call it 'grief sponging' where I come from it does get on my wick a bit. When it's not genuine and more narcissitic more - 'look at ME, I'M soo upset'
Happens on facebook a lot when someone who you went to school with/vaguely know passes away and suddenly everyone was their best friend. I find it odd at best, egotistical at worse - it's like they want to be part of the 'action' for want of a better word
Think it's ok to be sincerely upset when something as barbaric as the woolwich incident happens as it is one of those things that shocks and upsets most human beings to the core. Nothing wrong with showing your respect and support however you feel
I am quiet and dignified oldschool though.
There is a railing up on the estate with tinsel all year round. Now if my DH was drug dealer, who had unfortunately been fatally stabbed at Christmas, I wouldn't be laminating his picture and forever reminding people he was a nair'do'well.
No dignity whatsoever.
YANBU. Though I think you were being equally mawkish by planning on going to pay your respects at 5am. Why? You didn't know him?
I do understand what you mean OP but also at the same time that for example with Lee Rigby no-one had laid down flowers, it wasn't reported in the media, public didn't express their horror or sadness at such a tradegy.
It could come across that people don't care, that they accept what happened is now just a part of how the world is becoming.
I do think it can become OTT, but I don't see the problem with showing respect, support and laying flowers.
mei - I have military background and an association with the Barracks.
Paying respects is different from acting as if you knew the person who died and are personally bereaved, IMO.
I mean, "forever in my heart" FFS? It's so insincere it's actually offensive.
Ugh "forever in my heart" ugh ugh ugh. Lies of course. It's just total waffle.
Holly - how were you planning on "paying your respects" that required a 5am trip?
I think you should call her on it Op, asked how much she is going to donate to Help for Heros. At least the charity might benefit from her...
I can get very upset by tragedies that don't directly affect me - eg Baby P - I avoided the news for weeks because that picture of his innocent face haunted me. And I remember the Lockerbie memorial service, which I didn't watch the whole of, but saw that little boy whose whole family had keen killed while he'd popped to a neighbour to get his bike fixed. I think you'd need a heart of stone not to be moved by such things.
But I loathe the whole public grief thing, and the bandwagon that people feel a need to jump on.
The fact is that tragic stories can be upsetting when you hear them, but it is indulgent and over-dramatic to pretend that it actually affects your every day life unless you knew the people involved.
Personally I think it's all linked with the world of reality TV. People want to be the stars of their own dramas, and when they don't have a drama they steal someone else's!
I think quiet acknowledgment of tragedy, some reflection on the fragility of life, and a moment to appreciate what we all have ourselves, is a sensible reaction. No need for mass mourning.
I thnk it it tribal, aligning yourself with a particular tribe and rowing into that collectivism.
I quite strongly dislike the mass hysteria, outpourings of grief and heaps of tributes. It's invasive and in a way it trivialises what's happened.
A bunch of flowers at the site of a crash put there by family is entirely different - it's like putting flowers on a grave. But cards, teddies and heaven knows what else for someone you didn't know creeps me out. Even worse are the messages on FB.
If it were someone in my family I'd you didn't waste a fiver on that but gave it to an organisation which meant something, or to set up a fund to help the family.
I've spent years thinking I'm an unfeeling, cold-hearted bitch but at least if I am there are others out there.
Completely agree. It is definitely much more about making yourself look like a great person rather than genuine empathy.
I can fell deeply sad for the family without becoming hysterical about someone I've never met.
Mob culture is a disturbing thing, even when being used in a seemingly positive way.
It sort of devalues the grief of his family and friends. He becomes public property. Weird.
I'm with you Holly in that I don't get how seemingly a whole nation can be so grief-stricken by the loss of someone they never knew personally.
The atrocity of the deeds in these cases are terrible, I'm not negating that. I'm not negating the genuine grief family and friends of these people feel. But I don't get why a load of people feel obliged to weep and wail publicly.
Sure, pay your respects, but not in a way which has everyone cluttering the place up with flowers and teddies and candles. They would do better to do something useful. Donate to an appropriate charity/victim support organisation, campaign for better security/legislation etc.
<waits to be flamed>
I agree with Imagine -- some things are very upsetting, it would be a cold world if people didn't get upset.
I am normally quite jaded (my research is on war crimes and atrocities) but even I get quite upset sometimes, most recently with the Newtown shooting, all those tiny children gunned down in their classroom. It really rocked me.
But like Imagine says, there's a difference between being privately sad and being all overdramatic about it and pretending to be personally affected by it.
The killing was an atrocious act, but surely the way the mainstream and social media is covering it, that's encouraging that act with the by-standers being forced to record it, and giving the murderers the attention that they wanted.
Flowers at the site, fair enough. A reflective post with some personal thought maybe. But sharing trite, gusshy pictures/ posts for someone you have no direct or indirect contact to is over the top and not offering support to the bereaved.
Although there is a sort of silver lining to mass grief sometimes, if it inspires positive change politically. The collective grief about Newtown led to a new push for gun control in the US. In Tunisia, the horror over the street vendor who set himself on fire turned into mass protests that toppled the regime and kicked off the Arab Spring.
Mass grief doesn't, IMO, have to take this form, though.
You are so NBU.
I find "collective grief" for a person not known to those involved is mawkish and embarrassing to watch.
Never understood the Diana thing.
Far better to donate to a worthy charity and leave the flower laying to those who actually knew the person involved. It's leeching off their grief, somehow.
I think with something like this where the event itself has been so graphically presented emotions will run higher.
I am not one to do this kind of thing - I probably wouldn't go and put down flowers unless I knew the person (and I am a very empathetic person) but I can understand how your friend has been swept up in the event - unfortunately social media means this behaviour can go beyond the event and it is not a very dignified way to express grief of the event.
But you didn't know him either and still went to his murder site. Public or not, you've engaged in the same collective hype about a man you did not know and had no connection to.
I didn't go down. I contemplated it and decided against it.
I completely agree OP. I thought I was alone in thinking that people seem to have lost all sense of dignity & proportion these days. It's as if there's a need to be seen to 'really care' (preferably on the telly or Facebook). Sad really.
We too are from Woolwich and have personal associations with the barracks. This weekend we were in the area for family and went past the Barracks. It seemed wrong to do so and not pause to pay respects for an event that happened recently. We do the same when near war graves in France and Gallipoli. I don't know those men that died but at the same time it feels right to do this. The flowers and tributes are very tastefully and neatly arranged. It feels right somehow. It was a bright sunny day. Lots of people were out. They stood in a queue at the bus stop. White, black, some in hijab. All just normal because this is London, and it just is.
I was glad I went. Reminded me that the majority of people in this country are sane.
Also took a moment to remember those killed and maimed in that same area from IRA bombs. As Irish and catholic I never felt blamed for those by association. I don't blame all Muslims for this either.
I don't agree.
This collective mourning is certainly more in-your-face due to 24 hour reporting and social networking, but it has always been with us. It certainly didn't start with Diana.
My MIL is very like this and I don't understand her very well, but she didn't suddenly start with Diana's funeral.
I remember FIL telling me how distraught she was - and she wasn't the only one - when the Aberfan disaster happened in 1966. She didn't know any of those families, either. The collective grief was felt far beyond Wales, though.
I agree Holly. The whole Facebook side of things seems so fake and forced.
Its very much the same as what I call the teenagers at funerals effect.
( obviously not all teenagers blah blah blah but you know the ones I mean)
Both Hillsborough and Dunblane preceded Diana's death, too.
Dunblane, in particular, had MIL in near hysterics and I remember being very scared by her reaction - it was so alien to me. I think StepFIL travelled all the way to Dunblane in order to lay flowers.
Mind you, I also remember being very scared by my Aunt and cousins' behaviour at my grandmother's funeral in the 80s. At the time, I put it down to their being Southern European. British Stiff Upper Lip they were not!
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.