When I grew up in '70s it was very much you need one pair of jeans (with room to hem them up and then take them down!), a few tops and a jumper or two. Having felt a bit awkward socially as a teenager because of it I was always determined to make sure my kids had more than I did and never felt like I did.
However, I'm also very much of the opinion that brands such as Hollister, Jack Wills, Adidas etc as far as clothing goes are taking the piss in terms of prices. Now my DD is a teenager she is becoming 'brand conscious' but still pretty sensible, and doesn't ask for lots of stuff. Most of her clothes are New Look/La Redoute and she really doesn't ask for much.
Her birthday is approaching (14) and she has asked for an Adidas hoodie for £45. I usually spend around £80-100 for a birthday present on the kids so this would be a major part of it. I'm just wondering if I'm being a bit mean. My view is that a New Look unbranded hoodie would be £15 and she already has 3 or 4 of that type so doesn't actually need another one. Therefore her wanting this Adidas one is a luxury.
But then I'm also wondering if I'm being a bit mean and should accept that things are just different now and these things matter much more and should take that into account.
So would you...
- Buy her hoodie as half of her present
- Count it as c£25 towards her present - the difference between the unbranded and branded hoodie
- Buy it her and then get her a full present on top.
Money is not enough of an issue to affect the outcome. I guess part of me still thinks she has plenty of clothes and if she wants this thing in particular it should be a luxury. Thoughts....