My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Grammar question: substitute A for B

78 replies

Theoretician · 01/08/2016 22:56

If a national newspaper editor told you to substitute A for B in a recipe that you've not yet seen, would you expect the original recipe to contain

a) A
b) B
c) could be either

OP posts:
Report
Emochild · 01/08/2016 22:58

B

Report
myownprivateidaho · 01/08/2016 22:59

B.

Report
GraceGrape · 01/08/2016 22:59

I would expect B to be in the original and I would use A as the substitute.

However, I guess it could make sense the other way round too. Sorry, not very helpful!

Report
CodyKing · 01/08/2016 23:00

A

A is in - for B which is the new ingredient

Report
SageYourResoluteOracle · 01/08/2016 23:00

I would say that the recipe contains B which could be substituted by A (A for B suggests that B is in the recipe but could be swapped with A)

Report
LumpenMonkee · 01/08/2016 23:01

B

Report
GiddyOnZackHunt · 01/08/2016 23:02

Logically B but it could be both. For example I have a recipe that uses milk and water. Sometimes I use all milk or less water and more milk.

Report
Dozer · 01/08/2016 23:03

I don't even understand the question!

Report
Catsize · 01/08/2016 23:04

Put a bit of both in?

Report
Discobabe · 01/08/2016 23:09

A in original recipe. Substitute it with B.

Report
TinklyLittleLaugh · 01/08/2016 23:14

Hmm in football, the player who is taken off is substituted. And the player who come on instead is the substitute.

Er, I think it could be read either way.

Report
elQuintoConyo · 01/08/2016 23:16

What Discobabe said.

I think.

Head hurts.

Report
BillyNotQuiteNoMates · 01/08/2016 23:18

Either

Report
Emochild · 01/08/2016 23:19

Substitute A for B definitely means B in the original recipe

If it said substitute A with B then it would be A in the original recipe

Report
Chasing2959 · 01/08/2016 23:19

B you are using A as a substitute for the missing/unavailable B.

Report
Nomorechickens · 01/08/2016 23:21

What Emochild said

Report
FinderofNeedles · 01/08/2016 23:21

B

Report
Evergreen17 · 01/08/2016 23:22

B

Report
SageYourResoluteOracle · 01/08/2016 23:25

Yup. Emochild's right: the crucial distinction is between the use of for rather than with

Report
SageYourResoluteOracle · 01/08/2016 23:26

Why d'ya ask, OP?

Report
Theoretician · 01/08/2016 23:26

I vote for B.

That brinks us up to 18 votes, I think. (Up to Sage, then mine in this post.)

  • 3 for A
  • 15 for B
  • 2 for c
OP posts:
Report
Theoretician · 01/08/2016 23:27

Article in the telegraph:-

www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/08/01/ditch-sausages-for-a-longer-life-say-harvard-scientists/

contains the following sentence:-

Substituting eggs for plant protein also led to a 19 per cent reduction in death risk.

I think that means plant protein is worse than eggs, which is the opposite of what they were trying to say.

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

RalphSteadmansEye · 01/08/2016 23:28

I'm with Emochild, too. Distinction between for and for.

Report
UncleHerbie · 01/08/2016 23:28

B

Report
RalphSteadmansEye · 01/08/2016 23:28

Hmm. For and with, obviously.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.