To think these two girls should get a slap..

(299 Posts)
Jenj1983 Mon 04-Jan-16 21:44:22

for putting super glue onto the seat of a DISABLED toilet??!

Read the story earlier, apparently the two teens are aged 16-18, and some poor 4yo girl went in after them and had the skin ripped from the back of her legs!
No doubt these two little twats will get a lecture and a wrist slap.

DisgraceToTheYChromosome Mon 04-Jan-16 21:51:17

Hopefully they'll be charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm, convicted, sued by the victim's parents and then be subject to a few years of toilet cleaning until their convictions are spent.

Jenj1983 Mon 04-Jan-16 21:53:27

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ilovesooty Mon 04-Jan-16 21:54:19

I'd like to know if any of the users of this toilet actually had a disability.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost Mon 04-Jan-16 21:54:50

Poor poor little girl. Bless her.
Pair of cunts.
They should be arrested charged with
Disablist behavior.
Criminal Damage.
The harm done to the to that poor little girl.
I mean not that it is excusable behavior at any age of course it's not but they're 16-18 ffs. Not little kids.
Also they should be banned from working anyone vulnerable seeing as they have such content toward them, and they do or they would not have done something so hideous.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost Mon 04-Jan-16 21:55:27

That's not the point Sooty.

Jenj1983 Mon 04-Jan-16 21:57:01

Totally agree Ilive. When I read I thought, the kids that done it will probably be about 11-14 something like that (like you said no excuse but anyway) then when I read 16-18 I thought WTAF.

ilovesooty Mon 04-Jan-16 21:57:57

You might not think it's the point but I'm wondering if the perpetrators should have been in the disabled toilets and whether the four year old should have been there.

LaurieFairyCake Mon 04-Jan-16 21:59:10

I think it's a hate crime

Jenj1983 Mon 04-Jan-16 21:59:34

When the perpetrators are in the toilet pouring glue around the seat, I'm going to assume that no they were not disabled.
Apart from being a bit mental in the head obviously.

Jenj1983 Mon 04-Jan-16 22:01:01

And ilovesooty a 4yo girl had the skin ripped off the back of her legs and her bum..
Who actually gives a crap if she should have or should not have been using the disabled toilet.

hownottofuckup Mon 04-Jan-16 22:02:32

A 4 yr old ended up with her skin bring ripped off and you're worrying about toilet etiquette?
Are you really concerned upon hearing the story as to whether the 4 yr old has a disability or not?
Weird.
YY to hate crime.

ilovesooty Mon 04-Jan-16 22:02:41

I'm assuming the perpetrators didn't have a disability and there's no suggestion that the victim had either. Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened.

cuntycowfacemonkey Mon 04-Jan-16 22:02:43

Nasty little fuckers let's hope they are charged

hazeyjane Mon 04-Jan-16 22:03:03

putting superglue on any toilet seat is fucking heinous.

I don't think speculating whether the 4 year old was right to be using the toilet is appropriate really!

MooneyWormtailPadfootProngs Mon 04-Jan-16 22:03:21

Isn't the disabled toilet also baby changing?

As a disabled woman and a mother I have no problem with parents taking kids to use disabled loos, sometimes it's easier with more space.

Iliveinalighthousewiththeghost Mon 04-Jan-16 22:03:43

Yes fully agree Laurie. It is hate crime,
I'm also saddened to see victim blaming as well.

rosebiggs Mon 04-Jan-16 22:04:08

They probably chose the disabled toilet because they thought that they were less likely to get caught.
It's irrelevant whether the victim had a disability.

RickRoll Mon 04-Jan-16 22:04:18

"I'd like to know if any of the users of this toilet actually had a disability."

Yes. Some of the users of the toilet had a disability.

MooneyWormtailPadfootProngs Mon 04-Jan-16 22:04:24

How do you monitor a disabled toilet? What about disabilities people can't see? Should someone have to explain to a toilet guard what their disability is in order to be allowed in? confused

cuntycowfacemonkey Mon 04-Jan-16 22:04:39

How exactly should a disabled toilet be properly monitored ilovesooty?

Notgivingin789 Mon 04-Jan-16 22:04:41

If I was there, I would of shouted at those girls. Despicable.

RickRoll Mon 04-Jan-16 22:05:03

"Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened."

How the fuck do you monitor a toilet?

hazeyjane Mon 04-Jan-16 22:05:24

Obviously the act is reprehensible but the disabled toilet had been properly monitored it might not have happened.

...someone else would have had the skin ripped off their thighs, and whoever that was, it would be as agonising as it was for this poor little girl

ilovesooty Mon 04-Jan-16 22:06:15

Of course not. I'm just suggesting that if the toilet had had to be accessed with a radar key the incident would have been less likely to happen.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now