My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Workfare scheme for loan parents of children as young as 3, as of next month.

999 replies

WaterLoadaCack · 01/04/2014 21:54

kept that quiet didnt they

OP posts:
Report
kilmuir · 01/04/2014 21:56

Sounds fine to me

Report
HappyMummyOfOne · 01/04/2014 21:59

Makes sense, the longer without work experience the harder it is to get a job.

Working mums get nine months maternity with pay, IS is already years longer than that. Its a good start but IS should only be payable to age one then all mums would be on an equal footing.

Report
WaterLoadaCack · 01/04/2014 21:59

Working for 15 hours a week, for no payment sounds fair?

OP posts:
Report
ShakesBootyFlabWobbles · 01/04/2014 22:00

Lots of women with children this age work, I am not sure what your point is?

Report
ProlificPenguin · 01/04/2014 22:04

Good plan

Report
90sthrowback · 01/04/2014 22:05

Is it the unpaid work that you have an issue with or the age of the child?

Report
Roseformeplease · 01/04/2014 22:05

Not sure why I should have to go back to work to fund someone else choosing to stay at home on benefits. Also, children do far better in school when they have a working parent as a role model.

Report
formerbabe · 01/04/2014 22:06

Really? So they are loaning these parents out then expecting them to work...dreadful

Report
Ponkypink · 01/04/2014 22:07

Heh well good luck to them finding the local authority childcare to cover that, since there is nowhere near enough and it's 15 hours if you're lucky so the workfare will have to be on the doorstep of the childcare provider. Hey, here's a novel idea, why not make all the single mums work in a creche looking after their own children so they are working rather than claiming benefits? We could fund this through taxes for 15 hours per week. Oh wait...

Report
UnionofMultitaskers · 01/04/2014 22:08

This is awful!

Report
GreenLandsOfHome · 01/04/2014 22:10

Working for 15 hours a week, for no payment sounds fair?

Er...wouldn't it be for people getting benefits? Not really 'no payment'.

15 hours a week from age 3 and childcare costs are covered, so it sounds like it's aimed at tying in with the existing free childcare at age 3. I don't see it unreasonable at all.

Report
MoominsYonisAreScary · 01/04/2014 22:10

I wonder how much that will cost the tax payer in childcare during school holiday

Report
GiveTwoSheets · 01/04/2014 22:10

Ok those saying about funding lone parents on benefits you do realise that your be funding the child care instead

Report
Ruebarb · 01/04/2014 22:11

love the term 'loan' parents that's what they will become to their children if they are forced to work this way!

Report
formerbabe · 01/04/2014 22:12

How offensive to working mums Ruebarb

Report
GreenLandsOfHome · 01/04/2014 22:12

All parents get 15 hours a week funded childcare/school place/whatever. That's not dependant on whether the parent is working or not.

Our 3 year old goes to nursery for 3 hours a day...free.

Report
GreenLandsOfHome · 01/04/2014 22:14

How so Ruebarb?

Why is expecting a parent on benefits to contribute for 15 hours a week, the number of hours that most 3 year olds are in nursery/pre-school anyway, unreasonable?

Report
WaterLoadaCack · 01/04/2014 22:14

The unpaid work bothers me greatly!

Work focused interviews yes, proof of job search, yes, proof of job applications yes! Not allowed to turn down X amount of jobs before going on job seekers, maybe.

But 15 hours a week unpaid work?

Sorry but working in the back of Wilkos isnt that great for work experience.

Im not in this position, although I do have a nearly 3 yea old and planning to work very soon. Ive been putting the feelers out, asking around and no one but no one seems to have vacancies.

Although admittedly Ive only looked in shops so far as thats where my experience lies.

OP posts:
Report
ifyourehoppyandyouknowit · 01/04/2014 22:14

In term time.

Report
MoominsYonisAreScary · 01/04/2014 22:15

Green not in school holidays they dont

Report
GreenLandsOfHome · 01/04/2014 22:16

It's not unpaid though. The Government is paying you for the 15 hours.

The only difference is, they'll no longer be paying you to give nothing back.

Report
GiveTwoSheets · 01/04/2014 22:16

Green This will happen when child has 3rd birthday funding for 3yr old dont always co-inside with term. Also the placements is 15hrs, you have to take into account travel especially if dont drive and school holidays whereas free 15hrs are not covered so extra child care will be a certain.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Joules68 · 01/04/2014 22:17

Well a bit more....recent.... Work experience might just get you an interview!?

Report
GreenLandsOfHome · 01/04/2014 22:17

No...so if the workfare thing happened, the tax payer would pick up the bill for the 13 weeks that others don't get funded.

Unless of course they made it term-time only.

Report
MoominsYonisAreScary · 01/04/2014 22:18

Maybe this is why the government has started funding 15 hours a wek for 2 year olds if you are on benefits

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.