to wish dd's nursery didn't have to assess her and give her targets?(40 Posts)
I know it's part of the eyfs and they have to, but ffs, she's 2!
I want to tell them to back the fuck off and let her play. I send her to nursery so she can play whilst I study for my degree, not to be given targets to meet. As long as they cuddle her when she needs it and give her fun things to do we're both happy.
They gave me a sheet when I picked her up the other day and told me to write down the things she can do at home. But, I can't see the point. Is there a point? Can we opt out?
They're not setting targets though, they're monitoring her development.
She is playing at nursery , they're not sitting her down and teaching her long division! But children learn all sorts of things through play. The nursery will have to ensure a variety of activities to teach different things, even though to the child and probably the parents, it's "just" play. Knowing what your child is capable of and if there are any issues means they can help her. Why wouldn't you want this?
Bonsoir that's really interesting about development being cultural, I've never thought of that. Can you give examples (general not personal!) what do French children do that British children don't (or vice versa)?
Targets at that age are fine as long as it's along the lines of "this is the next stage of development we're looking for".
After all we do that with our own dc, don't we? "They counted to 2 this morning for the first time, isn't that exciting!"
It's not okay if they're telling the child "we want you to do this next..."
This is the reason why I am leaving childminding after 11 years
her nursery has to do it for all their children for their nursery to get their funding etc and tbh I would want my child to be meeting her milestones nursery is all about developing through play and not just for messing about , send your dd to a childminder if you need her looked after but tbh childminders need to do the same as the nursery they need to set plans do reports on their charges
They're not setting targets though, they're monitoring her development.
^ ^ that
French babies sleep through by 12 weeks, eat four meals a day by six months, at 8, 12, 4 and 8, are out of nappies by 24 months, attend birthday parties at unknown homes on their own at 3...
In answer to one of your questions, yes you CAN opt out of the eyfs. It is not encouraged as sooner or later if you choose to opt into the school system your child will be assessed anyway. I'm led to believe its a hard process, But you can do it. Maybe try phoning the department of education people to find out how you go about it. (I asked my childminding quality assurance person how to do it once, on request of parents, and she wouldn't tell me how to do it, but I found out of someone else it could be done through the education people).
I agree that your child needs assessing so the correct level of activities can be provided though. I think sometimes it's just the way it is worded to parents is the issue and the amount of paperwork that is expected to show it is being carried out is part of the problem with the eyfs.
Personally I think it's got bloody ridiculous and now any organisation or individual involved in early years childcare/education is now in distinct danger of dealing in piles of post-it notes and not children. Understand the principles and reasoning behind it (I was in foundation stage when it came in and they were inflicting the tiara DVD on all and sundry) - but it's administrative tick boxing collecting evidence to keep ofsted off our arses bollocks and it's the primary reason I'm keeping mine at home until "nursery" age (and still in two minds about what to do then) as it's gone too far and I'd quite like my kids to be able to take a shit in a nappy without it being analysed and next steps allocated accordingly.
And I'm buggered if I'm sitting at home filling in assessment records when I'd rather be enjoying my kids! (Perfectly capable of monitoring their development myself - I know where they're at and where it relates relative to the average)
Developmental concerns used to be picked up with less paperwork in the past- it's not like people didn't think about them til a mountain of paperwork descended on them, and even when it has, it doesn't always answer the question as these things are fluid at this age.
I think this constant monitoring and having to demonstrate examples for every single child of very basic things interferes with the nursery workers ability to interact genuinely with the children= as it forces them to be constantly evaluating the child instead of really getting down and playing with them/encouraging play. It's just a weird way to view children.
YY far too much time spent on paperwork for Ofsted these days. It was a very bad idea to extend their empire into pre-school. Entirely wrong approach to infants and toddlers.
Sad thing I saw were some school-nursery girls deciding to play "schools". Normally this would be grabbing the teacher's chair and the whiteboard and the story books with their friends sat on the carpet. These days it's gone to - one gets the clipboard out of the writing corner and follows the other kid around "writing" notes.
Any good person working with kids and knowing them has a very good mental picture of where they are, where they should be getting to, and how to get them there - and they've managed that since the dawn of time without chasing 2, 3, 4 year olds around with a pile of post it notes and sticky labels - yeah you've always had the scrawled comments on planning about what's gone on to revisit and develop (or what's worked well/never ever doing that again!) - but it's bonkersland now.
Can't even go to baby group without the digital camera coming out to record what they've done in that session!
And do NOT get me started on the totally ridiculous waste of paper and printer ink from the endless photographs that get filed and ignored in various settings...
Mumsy some did...more slipped through the net.
I totally agree. Would much rather the staff interacted with the children than making copious notes. Or spent time planning fun activities than highlighting boxes.
My daughter's record once said that she didn't recognise a triangle. When I asked her she said " the one they showed me had curved corners". It's just ticking boxes in a rather inaccurate way.
I think it has got too much.
There is too much paperwork and too much monitoring.
I think its hard on the staff and I find it all a bit bemusing.
I work in child development so I know how important it all is.
I just don't think the amount of monitoring is necessary.
Its important to be able to identify issues but IME we get a fair few referrals that are triggered by someone jumping the gun instead of waiting for a child to meet milestones at their own pace.
That can cause huge issues for the family.
I think there should be more focus on good quality training and recruitment of staff. Staff should have the ability and confidence to be able to flag up issues if they arise.
Tick boxes are never a good idea.
They lead to a false sense of security and children fall through the net.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.