To think that my word should be final(53 Posts)
For example- if I (or DH) tell DS1 he cannot have any sweets until after a certain time, that is what should happen?!
At some point or other, all the grandparents have been guilty of something similar but have stopped once we've pulled them up on it. Except MIL.
I'm actually now starting to think that she is doing it deliberately to undermine our authority as parents.
Her and FIL stayed with us this weekend.
Saturday morning DS1 does his usual thing of asking for sweets before he's even had breakfast! I told him he could have some after he'd been to rugby (at 12pm) MIL heard me say this- she even repeated it to him.
Fast forward an hour. I come down from having a shower, she's giggling like a bloody schoolgirl and tells me she's given him a packet of sweets which he's already eaten
Bugger me, I get in from putting the washing on the line another hour or so later to find DS hiding under the kitchen table with ANOTHER packet of sweets. Which she confessed to giving him.
This isn't the first time she's done it either.
A few weeks back, we stayed with them. DS1 was messing around with his breakfast so I told him that if he didn't eat it, he wouldn't have any treats during the day (we're trying to lay a few ground rules with food at the moment as he's getting to be a right PITA at mealtimes )
I returned to the room a few minutes later to find his breakfast plate empty and him eating a chocolate biscuit.
MIL then makes a comment along the lines of 'granny likes marmite on toast too'- and starts giggling. FIL looked at me, rolled his eyes and said 'I told her not to'.
AIBU to be getting pissed off with this now? In my eyes, all she is doing is undermining me. Deliberate or not, I don't know.
MN jury- what do you think? Maybe I'm just being over sensitive?!
mummy and daddy don't have a disturbed night
I'm a nanny and I have encouraged parents to tell grandparents that the additives in sweets make the child come out in horrific eczema a few days later. And that chocolate has a laxative effect on them!
I have stock photos of ex-charges who had eczema when it was at it's worse which we show grandparents. We also tell tales of nightmare explosions in the middle of the night that left the child distraught and exhausted! We don't encourage the children to lie. Although most of my charges have been around a year old when grandparents want to start giving them little treats.
I also tell them that the children won't remember being spoilt with sweet treats, they will however remember the atmosphere during visits and that mummy and daddy were cross with granny and that made them sad. They will remember treats of outings to the zoo, park, swimming, kisses and cuddles and spending time with them.
I/my bosses don't ban treats and when we know granny is coming we restrict our giving of treats for the week before and afterwards so that granny can spoil away, but with the proviso that it is chocolate and it is after lunch so that mummy and daddy have a disturbed night. We also tell them that a nice cream is a great treat when they are out but no brightly coloured ice lollies!
But I am a bossy nanny!
I agree that YANBU especially as ds is so young. My dd's little face homes in on cake etc if her GPs are round for tea. We generally don't give her any but when my Dad ignored a specific request not to give her cake and gave her some chocolate cake (she's not yet 2) DH told him off quite firmly (he didnt bother to hide his irritation). My Dad, bless him, now doesn't give her cake, instead we get her one of her snacks (usually lower in sugar!) .
Any GP ignoring this needs to be firmly told its not what you want.
The rugby part is kind of irrelevant to the story. It's 'rugby tykes', they can start at 2yrs. DS started last week
5Foot5 - That's what I thought - I didn't realise he was just 2.5!
The deliberate undermining would annoy me far more than a few extra sweets. YANBU.
Your 2.5yo plays rugby!? Golly I didn't know they started that young.
2.5 is very young to be given a packet of sweets in any circumstance - I thought you were going to say that he's 7 or something!
Yes, nip this in the bud now. If she must do something 'special', then ask her to play a silly game or buy him a comic.
YANBU, I had this battle with my MIL a long time ago. She would give sweets when I had expressly said "no", she would encourage the children to put their tea in the bin and tell me that they had eaten it all and if I allowed them to do something she would critisise that, such as allowing them to walk along a wall, she would lift them down and tell them that I didn't care of they fell, but Nana would look after them . I know that it was a power game. I still don't get why - other than that she is barking mad!
Your child, your rules, regardless of the location/circumstances. YANBU at all. I would sit down with her, with DH, and explain you're trying to set boundaries and rules, and you both feel she's undoing that good work, which in the long run won't do him any favours. Also, sweets before breakfast is just plain wrong for a 2.5 yo, and you want to teach him healthy eating habits. Other posters are right that you can treat a child to all sorts of things, without it being food-related, and without going back on rules that have already been set. I'm annoyed on your behalf OP.
If you teach your ds that he isnt allowed sweets before tea or if he hasnt eaten all of his meals for example would be better than saying you will be punished for the sweets granny gives you. Because when he is older he may help himself to sweets if u have any in the house.
My dd has to ask for snacks and has always been taught this.
I think YANBU both my parents and my in laws do this.
I have to say no to the sweets and I look like a controlling mum or I am the one trying to feed sugar crazed children tea when they are not hungry anymore.
Lose lose situation I guess.
<watches thread with interest>
Thanks for all the suggestions.
DS is 2.5- I'm not sure he'd understand the concept of being 'punished' for something that was ultimately granny's doing. Tho he certainly understands how to wrap her around his little finger so maybe I'm underestimating him
I'll have a chat with DH tonight and see if he'll talk to her about it. Again!
I agree with the last few posts. Something else MIL and your DS could have as their thing (my mother used to send her grandsons the Beano, and later football magazines, which they loved) as a specified alternative to sweets sounds like a great idea.
How old is ds by the way?
If she's mainly trying to be friends with him then can you direct her to another way in?
I still remember my aunt sending us a particular comic every week. We could have got it in the shop near us but somehow it was more special to send through the post.
She is trying to buy his affection with a mix of sweeties and naughtiness. Its quite common as DGC age and the grandparents no longer have an uncritical baby to cuddle, but arent part of their school or hobby life as they grow. She needs another outlet for this.
I would try to find an activity that they can have as their special time and introduce that. Then I would also ask her to respect your ground rules on sweeties as he is developing bad habits.
Even if she doesnt get the implied threat to withdraw her "special time", she will hopefully be secure enough to stop using bribery to get his affection.
Your reasons for restricting sweetie/biscuit access (for example) are fair and in line with what many parents would appreciate. You are teaching them that eating full meals comes before treats. You are also showing them that if their behaviour is good that they may be rewarded later. The key is that you have set the rules and compliance can reap a reward for the children. When you MIL offers the rewards first then that undermines the lessons that you are trying to implement. You have been specific with her about your rules. I would therefore find her giggling and flouting very annoying/unsupportive. Perhaps she does not remember how difficult it can be to get standard behaviours instilled?
When my MIL comes round with treats for the kids - she always asks the best time to give it to them - straightaway, before/after tea, on good behaviour etc.
I think there is a difference between 'spoiling' children (as a mark of fondness and campassion) and presenting treats and a time to undermine the house rules.
Because I like to deal with things as they come up; I would have to discuss the consquences of this inconsistent approach with her; and also if that they presents you with problems after she has gone.
I think some posters should remind themselves that they will be mils one day.
Just pull her up in front of everyone and ask her why she does not have the imagination or intellect to come up with fun things and treats that do not involve deceit undermining and food.
At their house I wouldn't try and have food battles, just let him eat what he wants.
Apply your rules at home.
It sounds like she is largely doing it to get a rise out of you, so if you just back right off then she won't find it so amusing and it will stop happening.
I agree with lizzy's post. Tell your DC to keep the sweets until later.
So just because grandparents aren't paid to look after your children they can do what they like? That makes sense.
When my dd is with my mum (only granny she has) i am quite relaxed about what my dd eats or does up to a point.
For example my mum allows my dd to eat what she likes at hers which is not that bad but when i get home after work & she refuses to eat her tea then i will have a problem with it.
Your situatiok is different as she is even doing this in ur own home when she has been told no. I like the idea of punishing ur child for eating the sweets (sounds horrible but it might just work). Hopefully it would only be for a short time.
With my grandmother, she ignored my mother, but my father only had to say 'Oh!' (not an English 'Oh!', the West African, percussive, very expressive 'Oh!' that means 'I am about to take you to task, big-time') when the sweetie bag was being opened and it was snapped shut again very smartly!
In other words, would your DH have more luck with her?
Your MiL can still 'spoil' your DS and give him treats etc - but she has to understand that they have to be approved by you.
I don't understand GPs who don't check with the parents before handing things out to their grandchildren, never mind giving them stuff that has been already been 'banned'!
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.