if you smoke, would you smoke outside the hospital, in your nightwear?

(235 Posts)
waikikamookau Wed 22-May-13 16:17:53

cos I am shocked whenever I walk by, virtually every day, with all and sundry sitting in their pyjamas.
have they no shame.
what I would do? get some proper clothes on for god's sake,

LarvalFormOfOddSock Wed 22-May-13 22:46:27

Thank you.

LarvalFormOfOddSock Wed 22-May-13 22:48:06

But getting back to the OP. No, I had no shame. Why would you when you want to be dead?

flanbase Wed 22-May-13 22:51:40

ladymary - I agree smoking should be banned.
for the poster who said on my wearing a mask in pollution - I have to and it's very difficult as it's hard to breath in it as it gets hot and humid on my face. Wearing this and going through smoke adds another dimension to feeling blocked.
On all the comments on doing dangerous sports and drinking I would say it's a choice but can be done in reference to safety guidelines. As long as the chute opens fine and safety followed, as long as in nhs guidelines for alcohol. With smoking there is no safe area to refer to.

flanbase Wed 22-May-13 22:53:12

typing - dangerous sports & drinking to be done at different times

kawliga Wed 22-May-13 22:55:57

flan, how long does it actually take you to walk past a smoker, and how much smoke do you breathe in while you're walking past, and how often are you in a situation where there's no way you can find a different route without going past the smoker?

Just calling for some perspective here, we often momentarily encounter hazards in this life. I don't agree that people should be banned from doing anything that might pose a hazard to me if I happen to walk past.

flanbase Wed 22-May-13 23:49:56

To get past a smoker standing smoking depends on the location. Up a flight of stairs is going to be tougher than a flat stretch. The amount I breathe in depends on the air movement and again on location for eg if by a door or going in through an open window. It is very hard to hold my breathe as other people can and sometime impossible really. Every day I have this issue and I have my routes planned as best I can. I would like smoking in public to be banned. I can't think of a comparison to help explain. It's like someone with a nut allergy being unable to predict or get away fast enough from them & not being able to refuse them. If that helps to give it a context. The nut allergy person has the moment to ask on nuts being in foods/ products and to avoid though and people respect this. For smoke it's the smoker who has the legal right and not myself to avoid it as I never know where a smoker will be. It's not the perfect comparison and no offence to nut allergy people/families as I know it's a very simplified version of having this allergy

KhaosandKalamity Thu 23-May-13 05:54:57

Is it legal to smoke on hospital grounds in the UK? NZ hospitals seem to be almost constructed of no smoking signs, and so help you god if you disobey. But we do get people in pajamas walking across the road to smoke. Being a smoker something about being stuck inside in a stressful situation where you can't smoke drives me insane with the desire for a ciggy, but the nurses and doctors treat you like the devil if you ask if you can go out for one.

MiaowTheCat Thu 23-May-13 08:28:22

I queued for Costa Coffee repeatedly in my pyjamas (and post-childbirth PJs are never the most glamorous kind).

That's worth another good three pages.

Thurlow Thu 23-May-13 09:52:17

Yes, but someone taking part in a dangerous sport is deliberately putting themselves at risk. Take rugby - a great sport, but god knows how many rugby players end up in A&E every weekend with dislocated shoulders and broken noses.

I might smoke, but I don't do anything else that puts me at a higher than average risk of needing NHS treatment. I'm not overweight, I don't drink more than the guidelines, I don't take part in any sports or activities that have a risk of injury... So how are you going to measure that? How on earth can you pick one arbitary thing that is bad for you and say that that is the one legal thing that people who do should get less NHS treatment for? And how are you going to decide which of their medical problems is actually caused by smoking? I repeatedly suffer sinus problems - one argument says they could be exacerbated by smoking, but of course they are also caused by hayfever - should I not get any treatment for that?

You need to actually think through your arguments before coming out with a statement like that.

flanbase Thu 23-May-13 11:04:46

thurlow it comes down to what is a safe limit for something. All our actions have a risk to them and life is a risk itself. Smoking is never good for the health. There is no safe limit or any possible safety guidelines to follow. If you choose to smoke then imho you should pay more for your healthcare. It's not a popular thing to say but it's my opinion. You made a choice to smoke which will be doing you no good and passive smoke is not good for the health of those around you. If all smokers paid an extra amount for the nhs then it would make people think twice before making the free choice to start to smoke. If people who drove recklessly could always get their cars fixed at no extra cost because everyone paid the same car insurance it would be an outcry.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now