ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
to think that if SATS judge teachers not students...........(52 Posts)
.......then they shouldnt put such pressure on the kids if they are confident in their own ability to teach?
DD is in a right state about her Y6 SATS. She has had it right left and centre from her teachers (3 on a job share, dont get me started on that). I have read here and other places that the biggest issue with SATS is that the teacher gets appraised on the results.
So if they are good teachers and are confident in their teaching abilities then they shouldnt be making such a big deal out of it? DD is gifted (she has been assessed as such) and yet her nerves mean that she may well have terrible results. Surely the teachers dont want that?
AIBU to think that if you are a good teacher you dont need to pressure the children you are teaching to the point of abject fear?
PS. I have six kids, only one is gifted, before I get jumped on!
I am a teacher,I know all about having to play the performance management game , but as professionals we should not make children pay for the pressure we are put under. If I think I am being asked to something meaningless which also harms children, I don't do it and tbh if I am going to be sacked for putting children first, so be it.
I have to justify every single student that does not make the necessary progress or meet their target, but that does not make me out unnecessary pressure on my students.
I agree teamedward....surely parents can make a stand and do something to get SATS wiped out. My dd is psychologically shattered!
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
SATS were around before Gove and Wilshaw although the grammar test fiasco has only served to make things worse.
I think it is disingenuous to just blame politicians and OFSTED. Teachers and head teachers need to realise that they are putting young children under immense pressure and passing along their own stress. They are intelligent people and must realise that they are part of a farce which starts with the over inflated levels they give in Year 2 and then keeps rolling.
Dont get me started on the fruit and veg thing.
2 of my DC's are hypoglycemic and fruit just doesnt cut it. Fruit gives them the same sugar high and then crash that they would get from a Mars Bar, but you try telling the school that. Fruit is good for a quick fix if they have already crashed but something like crackers or a pot of dry cereal (I couldnt bear to eat raw shreddies but they love them!) mid morning and mid afternoon prevents them crashing in the first place. I had to get a note from the doctor in the end!
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
cloud completely agree with you there.....the fruit thing is daft. A good old piece of flapjack is going to sustain any child til lunch time way better than a piece of fruit they don't eat!!!
They forget how much fruit acid the children's teeth are being exposed to. Promoting low GI foods and fibrous veggies would be more sensible.
I response to a post further up, I think SATS should be scrapped altogether. If their purpose is to rate a school, then surely that's what the Ofsted inspections are for.
Surely inspections with no warning would ensure that when they come to look at any school, the staff are teaching the normally planned lessons in the way they normally do. Schools have action plans in place in case they get a two day warning.......that is not realistic and doesn't then show a true representation of the school.
Inspectors are then looking at how the teachers teach and there is no pressure on the children to learn how to pass ingles exams aged 11.
Ours sent home a SATS leaflet advising parents of the benefits of a good nights sleep and (I can hardly wait to share this astonishing piece of advice regarding child care, so stand by...) breakfast.
Well I never! All these years of looking after 3 dc and none of this occurred to me before. How have I managed all this time?
I also get fed up with 'healthy food' being promoted in school as fruit or vegetables only Clouds. It's misleading and totally the the wrong message to send. I even went in and had a lively discussion
argument about it. Got nowhere
Our school has pissed me off today re SATs. They are a 'healthy school' and as such, children are only allowed to take in fresh fruit for a snack. My ds is a bit fussy and doesn't eat much of the sort of fruit that is easy to take to school. There are only so many bananas and apples you can eat on a daily basis, and apparently no self respecting Y6 boy is going to stand there at breaktime either peeling a satsuma or with a little tupperware pot of pineapple/mango/strawberries etc.
Yet this week, the year 6's are allowed to take in whatever they want to eat at break time. So, the school acknowledge that it might help children's performance and concentration if they are allowed a snack mid morning, but apparently that only matters on SATs week when the teachers are under scrutiny.
Every other day of the term, cheese and a cracker, malt loaf or whatever is a terrible thing that should be avoided.
I just think it's ridiculous that the teachers have to take accountability for the kids not being that bright!
You can be an excellent teacher, but you can't polish a turd (as my grandfather used to say!). You can however roll it in glitter
...But then they get to raise the definition of outstanding again!
Sooner or later we're going to reach a point where no more juice can be extracted from teachers and no more knowledge can be crammed into the brain of the average child and the universe will implode.
It's endless pressure and a real focus on "outstanding".
Most job adverts for teachers now seem to specify "outstanding" teachers with evidence of outstanding teaching. So everyone's going to be outstanding which of course means no one stands out
Starts long before Y2... I was bollocked by a head long ago for assessing on-entry Reception baseline honestly as to what the kids could do - because it was going to hammer their Y6 SATs expectations for the cohort.
Thus I was sent away to change all the assessment so that a child who'd come in knowing numbers to 20, basic addition to 10 and could write her own name became one who recognised numbers to 5 and a couple of letters. Yes it was an exceptionally strong cohort coming in - but boy was I pissed, especially when she laid into me for NOT playing the whole fucking SATs game.
I don't think good SATS results are indicative of an outstanding school. I think they are a strong indication of miserable year 6.
And bunging in a load of fancy dress days to appear 'what fun we all are here' does not detract from that fact.
Cory I read before about your poor dd being harrassed. Words fail me . Did you take it further?
Jamdonut I was never concerned about whether the school was "outstanding" or not, I have never understood that either. My son went to a school that was rated outstanding before we moved and it was the worst school I have ever experienced. He was utterly miserable and ignored to boot because he had extra needs. I would never take an OFSTED rating as read.
Bogeyface I completely 100% agree with your op and have said similar on here before.
SATS are supposed show how a school has performed for the duration of a child's time there; a culmination of all that has gone before. So in theory all that should be required by May of yr 6 is a bit of gentle low key revision covering all that has been done to date.
If of course they have the confidence that all that went before was sufficient. But clearly they dont think that because the reality is a headless chicken routine that begins around Christmas and makes everyone's lives a misery. An intensive cramming exercise to jam as much as possible in to 'do well' in a test. It all seems very last minute to me.
They're a happy bunch who enjoy school though! That is 100% more important for their outcomes than some arbitrary test at Y6 so I think you are must be a brilliant teacher.Shame the numbers won't reflect what it truly important.
Unfortunately, whilst many parents who use the data to choose a school might pay lip service to that sentiment, they will be looking for better results or they will worry that their own children won't achieve.
There must be a better way, but I don't know what it is.
I loathe the way SATs are now; the pressure, the relentless 'revision', the absence of any actual teaching from January onwards.
When my 27 year-old sat them there was a little 'technique' teaching, but that was it.
I like the idea from another thread that parents take their children out of school for a week!
However, I would also hate to go back to the days when schools weren't accountable at all and you had no basis on which to make decisions about your child's education. I just know that this way isn't the right way.
But - 'Yes they are pointless. All because parents want quantifiable data in league tables. The screw gets turned on teachers, who then turn it on the kids. You can, of course, thank the Tory government for this.' isn't entirely true. Labour didn't abolish them either, and I doubt a future government of any colour would be in a rush to, as parents do use the data -until it's their children sitting them.
They're a happy bunch who enjoy school though!
That is 100% more important for their outcomes than some arbritary test at Y6 so I think you are must be a brilliant teacher
Shame the numbers won't reflect what it truly important.
But level 4 isn't exactly too high to aim is it; it pretty low from memory and hasn't recent research indicated that children with a strong gri on the three rs do better in adult life? Having said that mine were free reading at six and it had ittle to do with the school where they were dragged through every book on the flipping ORT - bonkers!!
ilovesooty Sun 12-May-13 23:35:22
"However, the sad fact is that there are many teachers working in abject fear too. Under the new systems for PRP and assessment, experienced teachers are only a few short steps away from capability procedures and dismissal if they have a poor year results wise."
I don't get that. As a university lecturer in a small and threatened subject, my job is also under threat- indeed for the first 10 years of my employment I was on yearly contracts and went in on the first week of term every year to hear if I still had a job.
Yet I could never take that out on my students and I don't know a single colleague who could. It's not their responsibility.
Yet my dd's junior school were prepared to continually harrass a sick and disabled 10yo child because they were afraid of their Ofsted inspector. I had teachers saying to me "I know this is wrong but I daren't speak to the head". I just don't get how an adult can have such a weak and irresponsible attitude.
As someone else said upthread it all starts in Y2. Unrealistic levelling there sets the chn up for a fall when they get to Y6. This in turn puts pressure on the teachers. This doesn't come from the teacher though. It comes from the Head, LA, league tables... The list is endless.
I wholeheartedly disagree with sats as a way of measuring success of schools, teachers, children.
Yes they are pointless.
All because parents want quantifiable data in league tables.
The screw gets turned on teachers, who then turn it on the kids.
You can, of course, thank the Tory government for this.
this is the trouble,isn't it?
Parents want "outstanding" schools. SATs has a lot to do with that rating. To achieve that, of course schools will do everything in their power to make sure pupils get the best score they can. Just don't complain your children are stressed. The teacher's will be just as stressed,because a poor year will show up in the data, even if they are an outstanding rated teacher.
It can't be done both ways...either SATS matter or they don't. Which is it? And what would be a better way to rate schools? Or not rate them at all?
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.