Note: Please bear in mind that whilst this topic does canvass opinions, it is not a fight club. You may disagree with other posters but we do ask you please to stick to our Talk Guidelines and to be civil. We don't allow personal attacks or troll-hunting. Do please report any. Thanks, MNHQ.

To think middle-class Guardian reading lefties, really are morally superior to their rabid Daily Mail/Telegraph reading counterparts?

(207 Posts)
ComposHat Belgium Sun 05-May-13 01:47:49

Posh lefty handwringers/Champagne Socialists/The Islington mafia call them what you like, but I think they are unfairly maligned.

Because in purely self economic terms it would be more beneficial to adopt a right wing stance and advocate less taxation, cuts in stamp duty and inheritance tax, yet they take an opposing view in the interests of fairness and justice.

By contrast, Middle/upper class Tories act largely in their own interest.

LittleMissLucy Sun 05-May-13 03:52:36

And the AIBU is what, exactly?

What about people who read all those papers, daily? How would you like to categorize and / or dismiss them?

Salbertina Sun 05-May-13 03:52:51

Sigh

OrangeFootedScrubfowl Sun 05-May-13 03:56:46

Depends. What if the G reader is an arsonist and the DM reader runs a donkey sanctuary? Or summat.

LittleMissLucy Sun 05-May-13 04:19:14

what if Telegraph "reader" only buys it to wipe his / her bottom?

Springdiva Sun 05-May-13 04:49:42

Aren't they all teachers?

Salbertina Sun 05-May-13 06:10:07

grin

MrsWolowitz Sun 05-May-13 06:43:23

Ah how easy it must be to live in a world where you can judge someone from their choice of newspaper.

Salbertina Sun 05-May-13 06:52:32

Yep! Takes me right back to the 6th form

seeker Sun 05-May-13 06:53:26

Read the post as well as the title, people.

I think there are still some one nation type Tories who occupy the moral high ground, compos, but in general I agree with you.

People are now deeply suspicious or disbelieving of anyone who has believes or who votes against their own personal best interests.

Abra1d Sun 05-May-13 07:04:29

Many Guardian readers carefully position their families near decent state schools, so they don't have to worry. They live in leafy areas.

i know many, also, who send children to private schools.

Equally I know Telegraph readers like my husband who has spent the two years of his redundancy working pro bono for charities. He voted Tory, which directly led to his unemployment (the new govt cancelled his contract). He still thinks (as do I) that there was no other option. Labour had blown its moral credibility by lying (Iraq) and spending all the money.

So who was self-serving in this instance?

FanjoForTheMammaries Sun 05-May-13 07:06:23

YANBU wink

Cerisier Sun 05-May-13 07:06:27

The Guardian readers I know are teachers, doctors and government workers. None of them create wealth for the country, all of them are paid for by the taxpayer.

All of their jobs are important but they are not being selfless in voting for big government and high taxes.

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep Sun 05-May-13 07:08:52

I don't think it's fair to lump the Mail and the Telegraph in together; the Telegraph may have a particular world view, but at least it makes an effort to report the actual news insted of just making up any old shit to inflame prejudice and bigotry like the Mail does.

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep Sun 05-May-13 07:09:55

Absolutely, Cerisier, we must remember that doctors etc don't pay taxes of course. hmm

JakeBullet Sun 05-May-13 07:10:41

Nah, one of my best friends is a rabid Tory grin, he is also one of the most selfless people I know. We have some right political rows (mostly wine soaked) but even if I DO lean to the Left/Centre I don't consider myself morally superior to my friend. ...but neither is he morally superior to me. As people we are very similar but just vote differently and see the answers to issues in a different way.

dolcelatte Sun 05-May-13 07:14:48

Interesting.

It is much easier to have a 'touchy feely' view on the less fortunate members of society if you are sufficiently isolated from them.

There have been a number of debates on here, for example, about benefits and those who claim them - usually by someone posting a link to the Daily Mail, which they then claim not to read - and lots of moral posturing about evil right wing racists.

The individuals who have the strongest views tend to be those closest to them. I am willing to believe that most people who claim benefits are entitled to them but that a minority abuse the system. However, if I'm frank, I don't know anyone on benefits - not because I shun them - I just don't come across them. So I don't lose sleep worrying about false benefit claims. I just pay my taxes and accept that some of the money will be spent wisely and some not.

However, it would irritate the hell out of me if I were working very hard for little reward and knew that my next door neighbour was making false claims/abusing the system. These are the people who are voting for UKIP ie the ones who consider that their views are not taken account of.

So, having digressed, I don't think the people you refer to are morally superior; they just like to think they are. I also suspect that many of these individuals, whereas sufficiently above the majority in terms of financial reward and education to feel entitled to be patronising towards those they see as beneath them, are not actually high achievers. They are not, therefore, being particularly self sacrificing in espousing left wing views in relation to stamp duty, IHT etc.

HoneyDragon Sun 05-May-13 07:18:21

What a bonkers op. That's rather cheered me up this morning.

Salbertina Sun 05-May-13 07:31:26

Dolce- v well put

Buddhagirl Sun 05-May-13 07:32:55

Yabu

NoWayPedro Sun 05-May-13 07:34:53

What newspapers do you think people of each 'class' should buy?

RubyGates Sun 05-May-13 07:44:35

It's very easy to look smug and superior, and nod your head at the wise political decisions coming from those benevolent socialists if

a) You are reliant on the government/local council for your income.
b) You are sufficiently well insulated from "real-life" to believe that the 'naice, outstanding, state school" that little Tarquin and Jocasta go to is indicative of what all state schools are like, (and you don't understand that other people's children are attending schools with security guards on the gate, shit on the walls and knives in pockets)
c) If the bottle of wine you had with dinner costs more than my week's entire grocery budget.
d) You only ever use public transport to a couple of stops into central London to see, "something quite daring" at the South Bank Centre.

YABVU
(I can't afford a newspaper, I read them at work in the library)

JakeBullet Sun 05-May-13 07:45:52

I think on here that any view considered "bleeding heart" by the more right wing posters is attributed to Guardian reading, leftie and Islington types. I have found one or two folk on MN so right wing they are practically goose stepping . I have to admit to a feeling of "moral superiority" over those posters.

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep Sun 05-May-13 07:45:55

It is a good point, dolcelatte, but on the benefit-bashing threads you do see people claiming their neighbour is falsely claiming, without any actual idea of what they are getting and why. 'Free cars' and the like.

dogsandcats Sun 05-May-13 07:47:14

smile grin hmm have any of them really.
I dont think there are enough days in the week to answer this post, so I wont.
This could be a very long thread, or not.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now