Just went to buy a magazine and I was looking at all the other tabloid titles and some of the magazines on display. It's all so prurient and prying into peoples lives, judgemental, obsessed with celebrity. What has gone on at the NoW is far worse than most, but presumably they were only seeking to get information by such vile means because there is a market for it.
Every time there is a 'tragedy' there is so much public wailing and gnashing of teeth, huge interest in very personal details, paparazzi chasing people for photos etc. But journalists/papers wouldn't do it if people didn't want to buy it. And with sites like mumsnet, and services like twitter, it all just whips everyone into even more of a frenzy. Just think how any mention of Soham or McCann goes.
There are loads of posters on here shouting about boycotting News International stuff, and generally making a big fuss. I presume that none of them ever buy Heat or Closer, or the Mirror, or watch reality tv shows?
I suppose what I'm saying is that shutting down the NoW is not going to solve the problem of a really horrible culture, is it?
PS I bought New Scientist.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
to think that 'the public' is partly to blame for this phone hacking stuff?
13 replies
youonlygetonelife · 07/07/2011 18:12
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.